Skip to main content

iRubric: Student Choice-Argumentative Essay Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Student Choice-Argumentative Essay Rubric 
The attached rubric supports Argumentative Essay Writing under the Common Core State Standards.
Rubric Code: FX646CX
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric CHMS Argumentative Essay Rubric
  Exemplary

50 pts

Proficient

40 pts

Basic

20 pts

Below Basic

10 pts

Intro / Thesis

Background/History<BR>
Defining Problem<BR>
Thesis Statement

Exemplary

Well-developed introduction engages the reader and creates interest. Contains detailed background information and a clear explanation of the problem. Thesis clearly states a significant and compelling position.
Proficient

Introduction creates interest and contains background information. Thesis clearly states a problem and the writer's position is evident.
Basic

Introduction adquately explains the background of the problem, but may lack clarity. thesis staes a problem, but writer's position may not be evident.
Below Basic

Background details are a random collection of information, are unclear, and may be loosely related to the topic. Thesis / position is vague or not stated.
Argumentative Points

Body paragraphs:<BR>
*cost to attend<BR>
*how will you pay for it<BR>
*general campus info<BR>
*student body info<BR>
*student/faculty ratio<BR>
*program of study<BR>
*any other important information<BR>
Conclusion

Exemplary

Well-developed argumentative points directly support the writer's thesis / position. Supporting examples are fact based, specific, and detailed. Objections are acknowledged and countered effectively. Conclusion revisits the thesis in a new way and applies the writer's position.
Proficient

Most argumentative points are related to the thesis, but one may lack sufficient support or deviates from thesis. Objection is acknowledged and countered with some logic and clarity. Conclusion summarizes thesis and key points.
Basic

More than one argumentative point lacks sufficient details and support. Writer attempts to address one or more opposing arguments, but the writer may not refute the opposition clearly or adequately. Conclusion mirrors introduction too closely, with little or no new commentary on the writer's thesis / position.
Below Basic

Most argumentative points are poorly developed. Objection to the position is missing or vague. . Conclusion does not re-visit the thesis or summarize key argumentative point(s).
Organization

structure<BR>
transitions

Exemplary

Logical progression of ideas with a clear structure that enhances the thesis. Transition are smooth and provide coherence between and among ideas.
Proficient

Logical progression of ideas. Transitions are present throughout essay and provide adequate coherence between and among ideas.
Basic

Organization is clear. Transitions are present, but may not lend to coherence between and among ideas.
Below Basic

No disceernable organization. Transition are not present.
Style & Conventions

Spelling<BR>
Punctuation<BR>
Capitalization

Exemplary

Writing is smooth, skillful, and coherent. Sentences are strong and expressive with varied structure. Diction is consistent and words are well-chosen. The tone is highly consistent with writer's position / thesis and appropriate throughout essay. Punctuation, spelling, & capitalization are accurate with few or no errors.
Proficient

Writing is clear and sentences have some varied structure. Diction is appropriate. Tone is generally consistent with writer's position / thesis and is appropriate throughout essay. Punctuation, spelling, & capitalization are generally accurate, with some errors.
Basic

Writing is clear, but sentences may lack variety. Diction is sometimes inconsistent and/or inappropriate at various points in essay. Tone may be inconsistent with writer's position / thesis. Several errors in punctuation, spelling, & capitalization.
Below Basic

Writing is confusing and hard to follow. Contains fragments and/or run-on sentences. Diction is inappropriate and inconsistent throughout essay. Tone of piece is highly inconsistent with writer's position / thesis. Many errors in punctuation, spelling, & capitalization distract reader.
Sources

Use of sources<BR>
format<BR>
Relevance and Rilability

Exemplary

Evidence from sources is smoothly and logically integrated into essay and serves to add credibility & insight into writer's position / thesis. All sources are cited accurately and are highly relevant and reliable. In text, parenthetical citations are used as needed.
Proficient

Evidence from source(s) is integrated into the text. Most sources are cited accurately and are generally relevant and reliable.
Basic

Some source material is used and may or may not lend credibility to writer's position / thesis. Several sources may not be cited accurately. Relevance and reliability may be questionable.
Below Basic

Little or no source material is used. Source citations are not evident or may be highly inaccurate. Relevance and/or reliability are strongly in question.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202