Skip to main content
iRubric: Composer project rubric

iRubric: Composer project rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Composer project 
Composer project
music composer research project
Rubric Code: FX49C88
By JanetWolff
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Composer Project
  Poor

3 pts

Fair

6 pts

Good

9 pts

Excellent

12 pts

Ideas

Poor

Ideas are not presented clearly. Necessary questions are not answered.
Fair

Ideas are presented but do not make sense within the paper. One or two questions are answered simply with no detail or substatial detail.
Good

Ideas are presented clearly and in a logical sequential order as to make the reader understand the information. Questions are answered but lack substantial detail that would support their statements.
Excellent

Ideas are presented clearly, in a logical sequence, in which the reader understands and can identify the significance of the information that is presented. Questions are answered clearly and have detail to support their statements.
Conventions

Poor

No punctuation or incorrect punctuation is used. Multiple misspelled words. No paragraphs marked. Paper is not written in their own words and no quotation or reference is given.
Fair

Several errors in punctuation. Few paragraphs marked. Some misspelled words. Paper is not written in their own words but some quotation and reference is attempted.
Good

Few errors in punctuation. Paragraphs are marked. Few misspelled words. Is written in their own words and minimal quotations are used but not cited correctly.
Excellent

No errors in punctuation. Paragraphs are clearly marked. No misspelled words. Is written in their own words and all quotations are marked and cited correctly.
Organization

Poor

Paper lacks organization and no clear outline.
Fair

Paper has some organization and a simple outline can be found.
Good

Paper is organized and clear in layout. An outline is clear.
Excellent

Paper is clear and concise. Sections are clearly divided and well thought out. An outline is apparent to the reader.
Reference

Poor

No reference cited.
Fair

Reference Cited incorrectly and is missing information.
Good

Reference is missing information.
Excellent

Reference is cited correctly.
Deadlines

Poor

Did not hand in.
Fair

Selected part was two days late
Good

Selected part was one day late
Excellent

Handed in on time.
Oral presentation

Poor

Was not done.
Fair

Information was not heard or understood.
Good

Some information was not heard and understood.
Excellent

Information was clear and understandable
Acrostic Poem

Poor

Not done.
Fair

Words did not match the composer well.
Good

Represented the composer. Not much color/creativity
Excellent

Colorful. Represented the composer well.
Interview

Poor

Two questions asked and answered.
Fair

Three questions asked and answered.
Good

Questions were asked an answered. No layout.
Excellent

Interesting questions and answers. Great newspaper layout.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n178