Skip to main content

iRubric: Journal Research APA Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Journal Research APA Paper 
Journal Research APA Paper
Review of Literature (Journals, not books). Research a literacy topic that interests you. Evidence-based, contributes to nursing practice. Submit one 3-5 page typed paper, double spaced, 10 APA guidelines. Include references citing at least 3 resources used researching the paper. Paper will be graded on quality of research to support the PICO question, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and references
Rubric Code: FBA997
By GMDIAZ
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Nursing  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Research Presentation
  Excellent

Meets highest expectations and is usually the result of thorough editing. Points are made clearly, convincingly, directly.APA format

(N/A)

Good

Meets assignment requirements, but possibly talks around the point. Has been proofread, but could possibly use more editing.

(N/A)

Needs Improvement

Does not meet the requirements. Perhaps rushed.

(N/A)

Quality of Research
30 %

Excellent

3 or more cited sources.
--Sources reliable and properly credited.
--All information relevant to the PICO question
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of project.
--Research in-depth and beyond the obvious, revealing EBP in Nursing
--Journals referenced are academic and current.-APA format
Good

--Fewer than 3 sources cited.
--Sources mostly reliable, with credit given.
--Most information relevant to project
--Sufficient information provided to support most elements of project
--Research of sufficient
depth.
Needs Improvement

--Failed to cite journal sources.
--Source reliablility questionable.
--Some information relevant to project
--Information provided to support some elements of project.
--Surface research. No APA
Content
30 %

Excellent

--Thesis interesting, of appropriate breadth & length an appropriate topic for research.
--Support for project complex, complete, & in-depth.
--Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.
Good

--Thesis somewhat broad or narrow for length of project
--Support for research project sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
Needs Improvement

--Thesis too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research.
--Support for thesis barely sufficient.
APA Format
15 %

Excellent

--All sources given credit in both paper and references.
--No more than three errors in APA imitation format.
--Correct APA title page.
--Correct APA header.
--Correct pagination.
Good

--All sources given credit in references
--Four to nine errors in APA citation format.
--Attempt to use APA format
Needs Improvement

--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography/references
-- More than than 10 errors in format or punctuation.
--Little attempt to format in APA style.
Quality of Writing
15 %

Excellent

--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Good

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No more than 5 spelling errors.
--Fewer than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Fewer than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Needs Improvement

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--More than 6 spelling errors.
--More than 4 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 4 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Length/Organization
10 %

Excellent

--All slides in PowerPoint
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Good

--Almost meets page requirements.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Needs Improvement

--Does not meet slide presentation requirements
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.



Keywords:
  • Research paper Review of Literature



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202