Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Literary Analysis Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Literary Analysis Rubric
Critical Analysis Rubric
Rubric to assess students' ability to construct a critical analysis that uses textual evidence to defend an argument
Rubric Code:
FAX878
By
Sammyosb
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Critical Review Submission
Inconsistant
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Very Good
(N/A)
Thesis Statement
Inconsistant
Writer's stance on the argument (thesis) is not clear.
Good
Writer states argument. Argument is somewhat developed.
Very Good
Writer clearly states his or her position. Writer's argument is thoughtful, complex and thoroughly explained.
Thesis Strands
Inconsistant
In the introduction the points of the argument (thesis strands) are not explained.
Good
In the introduction the points of the argument (thesis strands) are explained, but not clearly.
Very Good
In the introduction the points of the argument (thesis strands) are explained, clearly.
Introduction
Inconsistant
Introduction does not include a thesis statement or thesis strands.
Good
Introduction includes a thesis statement and thesis strands.
Very Good
Has a clear introduction, thesis statements and thesis strands that relate to the body paragraphs and conclusion.
Body Paragraphs
Inconsistant
Body paragraphs do not relate to the thesis statement and thesis strands. B paragraphs are not clear.
Good
Body paragraphs relate to the thesis strands, although they may not include topic sentences or be clear.
Very Good
Body paragraphs have topic sentences that relate to the thesis strands and run-on logically. Conclusion summarizes the point of the essay.
Conclusion
Inconsistant
Main points are not restated in the conclusion clearly and there is no connection back to the introduction.
Good
The main points are restated clearly but not in a new way. There is a connection back to the introduction but it needs to be clearer.
Very Good
The main points are restated clearly and in a new way. There is a clear connection back to the introduction.
Textual Evidence
Inconsistant
Evidence is not specific. Writer does not include at least three pieces of textual evidence. Evidence is simple and not fully explored. Evidence does not support the writer's argument/thesis.
Good
Includes at least three textual references to back up thesis, but they are not thoroughly explained or examined. Evidence is not specific and/or does not support the writer's argument/thesis statement.
Very Good
Includes at least three textual references to back up thesis. This evidence is specific and thoroughly examined. Evidence is quoted or paraphrased and clearly supports the writer's argument.
Mechanics
Inconsistant
The submission clearly has not been edited. There are numerous spelling, punctuation errors, and sentence structure problems.
Good
There are few spelling errors. Student uses mostly proper grammar, including correct punctuation and sentence structure in most cases.
Very Good
Uses correct grammar, including spelling, punctuation and sentence structure. Sentences are complete. Student uses capitalization where needed. Work has clearly been edited.
Keywords:
Critical, Analysis, Textual Evidence, Argument
Subjects:
English
Social Sciences
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.