iRubric: Attributes of Jesus Presentations rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Attributes of Jesus Presentations Rubric Code: F89C6B By ryanroyle Draft Public Rubric Subject: Philosophy Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Group Presentation
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Definitions?	Poor Definitions are unclear and vague. Doesn't help understand the basis of the attribute.	Fair Definitions are of average clarity, but don't truly differentiate between secular and sacred.	Good Strong definitions, clear definition between secular and sacred.	Excellent Solid definitions, truly represent each worldview in relation to the attribute.
How did Jesus show it?	Poor No clear examples or Scripture references. A verse or two are mentioned. Vague.	Fair Weak examples or loose scripture references. An attempt at an example is present.	Good Strong example, reliable scripture reference that reflects the attribute and Christ's portrayal.	Excellent Solid example, multiple scripture references. Elaborates on the why and the how.
Why is it important?	Poor Unclear as to why it is important. It just "is."	Fair Some explanation as to the "why" of its importance.	Good Gives a practical application of the attribute.	Excellent Goes in depth on the practical application of the attribute. Gives livable examples and relates to their life.
Example or Situation?	Poor No example or relevant situation described.	Fair Examples are there, but not quite solid. A stretch to make a comparison. Not much detail.	Good An example is made that expresses the attribute in a relate able way.	Excellent The example or situation relates completely to the attribute and gives a practical use of the attribute.
Overall Presentation	Poor Text was unreadable and information unclear. No flow or direction in presentation. Unprepared and lazily put together.	Fair Some good information shared, but rushed. Presentation has some evidence of preparation, but thrown together.	Good Good presentation overall. Group seems prepared, some flow issues and imbalanced work among members.	Excellent Great, solid presentation. All aspects are addressed and the group works well together. Handout is clear and provides information.