Skip to main content

iRubric: History of Western Music rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
History of Western Music 
Rubric Code: F69A98
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Project Rubric
  Terrible

Does not meet the requirements at all

0 pts

Poor

Barely meets the requirements

5 pts

Fair

Mostly meets the requirements

10 pts

Good

Completely meets the requirements

15 pts

Music Examples
This section is for grading the music examples presented for each time period.
Accuracy of music examples

How well to the music examples fit the period?

Terrible

Music examples are not connected with the type of music they are supposed to be embodying.
Poor

Music examples slightly embody the type of music that they are supposed to be representing.
Fair

Music examples mostly embody the type of music that they are supposed to be representing.
Good

Music examples completely embody the type of music that they are supposed to be representing.
How many music examples are there?

How many music examples are presented?

Terrible

There are no music examples.
Poor

There are music examples for only 1 or 2 time periods.
Fair

There are music examples for most of the time periods.
Good

There are music examples for all of the time periods.
Research
This section is for grading the research portion of the project.
Accuracy of information

How accurate is the information that is presented?

Terrible

The information has more than 5 mistakes.
Poor

The information has 3-5 mistakes.
Fair

The information has 3-1 mistakes.
Good

The information has 1 or no mistakes.
How well the know the info

How well do I appear to know the information?

Terrible

Practically reads the note-cards.
Poor

Looks at the note-cards for most of the information.
Fair

Looks at the note-cards occasionally.
Good

Looks at the note-cards for only a couple facts.
Presentation
The flow, ease, demeanor and eye-contact of the presenter.
Eye-contact and demeanor

Does the presenter have good eye-contact and a confident demeanor?

Terrible

Presenter rarely made eye-contact and appeared very inconfident.
Poor

Presenter sometimes made eye-contact and appeared slightly confident.
Fair

Presenter made eye-contact most of the time and appeared fairly confident.
Good

Presenter made eye-contact almost all of the time and appeared very confident.
Flow of presentation.

How well did the presentation flow and how easy was it to understand?

Terrible

Presenter had frequent stops and was forced to repeat things several times for people to understand.
Poor

Presenter stopped sometimes and had to repeat themselves and repeated himself occasionally for people to understand.
Fair

Presenter stopped rarely and had to repeated himself only once or twice.
Good

Presenter almost never stopped and never repeated himself.




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202