Skip to main content

iRubric: Oral Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Oral Presentation Oral Presentation Evaluates the key components of an effective oral presentation. Rubric Code: F292B2 By laneyk Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Oral Presentation Evaluation
	Poor 1 pts	Good 2 pts	Excellent 3 pts
Topic	Poor Presenter did not give a clear and concise introduction of the topic of the presentation, so the audience was confused about the purpose of the presentation.	Good Presenter gave a clear introduction of the topic, but the sense of why they were giving the presentation was vague. The audience for the most part understood the purpose of the presentation.	Excellent Presenter gave a clear and concise introduction of the topic, so that the audience understood the purpose of the presentation.
Research Analysis	Poor Presenter failed to give complete facts and some were confusing as to how they supported the topic of the presentation. Less than 15 slides.	Good Presenter gave a concise facts and was somewhat complete with her explanations of how these facts support the topic of the presentation. Minimum of 15 slides.	Excellent Presenter gave clear and concise facts and explanations of how these facts support the topic of this presentation. Minimum of 20 slides.
Organization	Poor Presenter was unorganized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was unclear and confusing to follow.	Good Presenter was organized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was somewhat clear. For the most part it was not confusing to follow.	Excellent Presenter was extremely organized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was clear and concise and easy to follow.
Language	Poor Presenter used words that detracted from the presentation and did nothing to support the topic.	Good Presenter used words that were mostly appropriate in supporting the topic of this presentation. The word choices lacked originality.	Excellent Presenter used language that was appropriate in supporting the topic. The word choices exhibited originality and were effective in conveying the appropriate tone for the presentation's topic.
Delivery	Poor Lack of eye contact, poor voice volume, tone and pacing. Reading directly from slides. Inappropriate gestures and movement, which detracted from the presentation.	Good Some eye contact and good voice volume, tone and pacing. Limited use of reading from slides. Some appropriate gestures and movment that supported the presentation.	Excellent Lots of eye contact. Great voice volume, tone and pacing. Only reference to slides, no reading directly from them. Hand gestures and body movement which supported the presentation.
Graphics & Visual Aides	Poor Minimal graphics or not-effective use of them.	Good At least one visual aid and some graphics that were used somewhat effectively.	Excellent Use of visual aids and graphics that were used to effectively support the presentation.
Overall Effectiveness	Poor Presenter was unenthusiastic, audience's attention showed disinterest and the purpose for the presentation was not achieved.	Good Presenter was somewhat enthusiastic and kept the audience's attention for the most part. The purpose of the presentation was mainly achieved.	Excellent Presenter was very enthusiastic, kept the attention of the audience the whole time and the purpose of the presentation was achieved.
Writing Mechanics	Poor Many errors in spelling, grammar, or capitalization.	Good Minimal errors in spelling, grammar, or capitalization.	Excellent No errors in spelling, grammar, or capitalization.
Team Collaboration	Poor Not everyone contributed fully to the class presentation or making of the powerpoint.	Good All team members contributed to the production of the presentation. All team members shared in the oral presentation, although some members spoke at greater length than other members.	Excellent All team members contributed to the production of the presentation. All team members shared in the oral presentation.

Keywords:

Oral presentation evaluation

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Communication rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202