Skip to main content

iRubric: KEAN STEM Biology Project Notebook Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
KEAN STEM Biology Project Notebook Rubric 
KEAN STEM Biology Project Strategy and Quality Rubric
This Rubric matrix measures the students ability to provide a an organized and clear notebook and raw data: The number of selections in each column is multiplied by the weight points per column (e.g. 2 sections in Very Good column (2x2.5 = 5) and 3 selections in the Good column (2x1.5=3 points). Then, points are added (5+4.5 = 8). Up to 10 points can be scored from this Rubric.
Rubric Code: F249C65
By ddescalz
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric
  Very good record tracking

2.5 pts

Good Record Tracking

1.5 pts

Poor Record Tracking

0.5 pts

Objectives

Very good record tracking

Experiments are dated
Each experiment contains title, purpose, and summary of experiment.
Experiment listed in table of content.
Good Record Tracking

Most experiments are dated
Some of the experiments are missing one or two of the following: title, purpose, brief procedure or
reference to lab manual.
Some experiments are not recorded in table of content.
Poor Record Tracking

Most experiments are not dated.
Most of the experiments are missing several of the following: title, purpose, brief procedure or
reference to lab manual.
Most experiments are not recorded in table of content.
Materials and Methods

Very good record tracking

All reagents are accounted for with description and expiration dates.
All instrumentation is listed.
Full procedure is listed for assay
Full experimental design is shown as a figure.
Sample list is complete and accurate and matches the raw data files.
Good Record Tracking

Most reagents are accounted for with description and expiration dates.
Most instrumentation is listed
Most of the procedure is listed for assays.
Most experimental design is shown as a figure.
Sample list is mostly complete and accurate and matches the raw data files.
Poor Record Tracking

Most reagents are not accounted for with description and expiration dates.
Most instrumentation is not listed.
Most of the procedure is not listed for assays.
Experimental design is not shown as a figure or missing.
Sample list is mostly incomplete and accurate and matches the raw data files.
Results

Very good record tracking

All observations are recorded completely.
All data is recorded and neatly presented with units to the correct number of significant figures.
All calculations are included and neatly presented with details including units and significant figures.
Data is explicitly analyzed, methods of analysis are described with appropriate detail.
Good Record Tracking

Observations are not complete and missing important details.
Data is recorded, but is not presented neatly or some are missing units or the correct number of significant figures.
Calculations are included, but are not
presented neatly or missing details including units and significant figures. Data analysis is implied, but not explicit, and methods of analysis are not described or properly used.
Calculations are not complete.
Poor Record Tracking

Observations are mostly missing.
All data is not recorded and not neatly presented with missing units and have incorrect number of significant figures.
Calculations are not included or are very sparse with no units and incorrect significant figures.
Data analysis is not included.
Calculations are missing.
Data interpretations and Conclusions

Very good record tracking

Results are explicitly interpreted and
compared with literature data and/or
concepts discussed in lecture.
Conclusion is written in coherent manner with proper English syntax.
Good Record Tracking

Superficial and immediate conclusions are recorded.
Results are interpreted but interpretation is not explicit.
Conclusions are not written coherently and contain some spelling or grammatical errors.
Poor Record Tracking

Conclusions are not logical and/or do not agree with data presented.
Conclusions are written in non-coherent manner with many spelling and grammatical errors.



Keywords:
  • Cancer, monocytes, macrophages, niclosamide

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n52