iRubric: Final Project Rubric

Student does use proper citations, lacks citations completely, and / or research is not evident in the project.

Student uses citations but citations have multiple errors and / or research has questionable reliability.

Student uses proper citations with minimal errors and research is reliable.

Student uses multiple citations with only one or two errors and research is reliable and incorporated effectively into the project.

Video or Powerpoint is visually unappealing. PP has poor color schemes and multiple spelling errors. Video has unprofessional acting, is shaky, and hastily filmed.

Video or Powerpoint is visually appealing.
Speakers and actors show slight understanding of the topic. Presentation reflects a lack of preperation.

Video or Powerpoint is visually appealing. Speakers and actors show above average understanding of the topic. Presentation reflects the participants preperation.

Video or Powerpoint is visually appealing. Speakers and actors are experts on the subject. Presentation reflects extensive preperation by participants.

Questions were hastily thrown together and provide little to no insight into real world uses of Language Arts and Algebra.

Questions are basic and don’t promote a deeper understanding of real world uses of Language Arts and Algebra.

Questions are well thought out and help deepen understanding of real world uses of Language Arts and Algebra

Questions are well thought out and help deepen understanding of real world uses of Language Arts and Algebra. Student was prepared for further questioning and clarification.

None of the guidelines were met. Story too short, doesn't incorporate interview info., lacks original ideas / creativity.

One guideline not met. Little to no connection between the story and the interview.

All guidelines met. Several connections made between the story and the interview.

All guidelines met. Multiple connections between the story and the interview. Student incorporates originality and creativity.

Actors not in costume. Lack of preperation is evident. Numerous forgetten lines.

Costumes appear sloppy. Some preperation is evident. Few lines forgotten.

Costumes are put together well. Preperation is apparent. One or two stumbles over lines. Actors portay characters in a believable way.

A lot of thought put into costume design and construction. Everyone well prepared. No lines stumbled over. Actors portray characters in a professional manner.

Skit or play is unoriginal. Lacks focus and depth of character and plot.

Skit or play shows some originality. Character and plot are slightly developed but not very compelling.

Skit or play is original. Characters and plot are almost fully developed and compelling.

Skit or play is highly original and creative. Characters and plot are highly developed and compelling.

The paper does not meet length and format guidelines. Few if any of provided questions are answered.

The paper meets length and format guidelines. Addresses most of the provided questions.

The paper meets length and format guidelines. Addresses all of the provided questions but lacks clear explanations of the questions.

The paper meets length and format guidelines. Addresses all of the provided questions and provides clear explanations of those questions.