Skip to main content

iRubric: Robotic Engineering rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Robotic Engineering Robotic Engineering This rubric is designed to assess the design of the team's robot. Rubric Code: EXX3C3B By sykoyoyo Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Robot Design Rubric
	Needs Improvement 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Innovative Design 5 %	Needs Improvement Design, drive train, and structure are standard. Manipulators/sensors used in expected ways, if used. Strategy for combining missions expected. Programming written as expected.	Fair Design creative, unique use of drive train or structure. Manipulators/sensors used in unexpected ways, if used. Unique/creative strategy for coordinating missions. Programming tasks used in unexpected ways. (For this category, 1 of the 4 above is demonstrated)	Good Design creative, uique use of drive train or structure. Manipulators/sensors used in unexpected ways, if used. Unique/creative strategy for coodinating missions. Programming tasks used in unexpected ways. (For this category, 2 of the 4 above are demonstrated)	Excellent Design creative, unique use of drive train or structure. Manipulators/sensors used in unexpected ways, if used. Unique/creative strategy for coodinating missions. Programming tasks used in unexpected ways. (For this category, 1 done exceptionally or 3 of the 4 above demonstrated.)
Locomotion & Navigation 5 %	Needs Improvement Difficulty going same distance on repeated missions. Too fast for accuracy, or too slow to accomplish mission. Turns inaccurate or inconsistent. Moves between tow points inconsistently. No effort to know position on table beyond distance and accurate turns.	Fair Goes defined distances sometimes. Turns sometimes accurate. Sometimes moves between tow points consistently. Little or no effort to know position on table beyond distance and accurate turns.	Good Goes defined distances most of the time. Not too fast for accuracy or too slow to accomplish mission. Turns reasonabley accurate and consistent. Allows for variables. Moves between two points with reasonable accuracy and consistency. May use various sensors.	Excellent Goes defined distances efficiently. Adjusts speed, position sensing for optimum speed and accuracy. Turns accurately and consistently. Allows for variables (battery wear, obstacles). Moves between tow points with very good accuracy and consistency. May use various sensors.
Structural 5 %	Needs Improvement Difficulty with robot assembly during demo. Base weak, falls apart when handled or run. Attachments, if used, weak and fall apart often; difficulty completing task; or overly complex. Robot design from book, little modification by team.	Fair Robot assembly done with few errors. Robot base structure has some stabliity. Attachments, if used, difficult to apply; and /or not modular; not precise or not repeatable. Robot show signs of team's design ideas.	Good Slow robot assembly, with no errors Robot base stable, but not robust. Attachments, if used, modular; function most of the time; and/or take some time to assemble; somewhat precese and /or repeatable. Robot designed by team.	Excellent Robot assembles easily. Robot base stable and robust. Attachments, if used, modular, function as expected and easily added/removed from robot. Robot displays wide range of capabilities. Attachments, if used, performtasks extremely well and are repeatable. Robot designed by team; design is unique and creative.
Overall Design 10 %	Needs Improvement Robots lack most critical design components: works, stays together, efficient parts use, attachments easy to add/remove, simpler than comparable robots. Few components work together; few components look like they belong together.	Fair Robot lacks many critical design components: works, stays together, efficient parts use, attachments easy to add/remove, simpler than comparable robots. Some components work together; some components look like they belong together.	Good Robot lacks some critical design components: works, stays together, efficient parts use attachments easy to add/remove, simpler than comparable robots. Most components work together; most compenents look like they belong together.	Excellent Robot is elegant, complete system. All components work well together. All components look like they belong together.

Keywords:

Robot Design

Subjects:

Science

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Science rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178