Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Robotic Engineering rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Robotic Engineering
Robotic Engineering
This rubric is designed to assess the design of the team's robot.
Rubric Code:
EXX3C3B
By
sykoyoyo
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Robot Design Rubric
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Innovative Design
5 %
Needs Improvement
Design, drive train, and structure are standard.
Manipulators/sensors used in expected ways, if used.
Strategy for combining missions expected.
Programming written as expected.
Fair
Design creative, unique use of drive train or structure.
Manipulators/sensors used in unexpected ways, if used.
Unique/creative strategy for coordinating missions.
Programming tasks used in unexpected ways.
(For this category, 1 of the 4 above is demonstrated)
Good
Design creative, uique use of drive train or structure.
Manipulators/sensors used in unexpected ways, if used.
Unique/creative strategy for coodinating missions.
Programming tasks used in unexpected ways.
(For this category, 2 of the 4 above are demonstrated)
Excellent
Design creative, unique use of drive train or structure.
Manipulators/sensors used in unexpected ways, if used.
Unique/creative strategy for coodinating missions.
Programming tasks used in unexpected ways.
(For this category, 1 done exceptionally or 3 of the 4 above demonstrated.)
Locomotion & Navigation
5 %
Needs Improvement
Difficulty going same distance on repeated missions.
Too fast for accuracy, or too slow to accomplish mission.
Turns inaccurate or inconsistent.
Moves between tow points inconsistently.
No effort to know position on table beyond distance and accurate turns.
Fair
Goes defined distances sometimes.
Turns sometimes accurate.
Sometimes moves between tow points consistently.
Little or no effort to know position on table beyond distance and accurate turns.
Good
Goes defined distances most of the time.
Not too fast for accuracy or too slow to accomplish mission.
Turns reasonabley accurate and consistent.
Allows for variables.
Moves between two points with reasonable accuracy and consistency.
May use various sensors.
Excellent
Goes defined distances efficiently.
Adjusts speed, position sensing for optimum speed and accuracy.
Turns accurately and consistently.
Allows for variables (battery wear, obstacles).
Moves between tow points with very good accuracy and consistency.
May use various sensors.
Structural
5 %
Needs Improvement
Difficulty with robot assembly during demo.
Base weak, falls apart when handled or run.
Attachments, if used, weak and fall apart often; difficulty completing task; or overly complex. Robot design from book, little modification by team.
Fair
Robot assembly done with few errors.
Robot base structure has some stabliity.
Attachments, if used, difficult to apply; and /or not modular; not precise or not repeatable.
Robot show signs of team's design ideas.
Good
Slow robot assembly, with no errors
Robot base stable, but not robust.
Attachments, if used, modular; function most of the time; and/or take some time to assemble; somewhat precese and /or repeatable.
Robot designed by team.
Excellent
Robot assembles easily.
Robot base stable and robust.
Attachments, if used, modular, function as expected and easily added/removed from robot. Robot displays wide range of capabilities.
Attachments, if used, performtasks extremely well and are repeatable.
Robot designed by team; design is unique and creative.
Overall Design
10 %
Needs Improvement
Robots lack most critical design components: works, stays together, efficient parts use, attachments easy to add/remove, simpler than comparable robots.
Few components work together; few components look like they belong together.
Fair
Robot lacks many critical design components: works, stays together, efficient parts use, attachments easy to add/remove, simpler than comparable robots.
Some components work together; some components look like they belong together.
Good
Robot lacks some critical design components: works, stays together, efficient parts use attachments easy to add/remove, simpler than comparable robots.
Most components work together; most compenents look like they belong together.
Excellent
Robot is elegant, complete system.
All components work well together.
All components look like they belong together.
Keywords:
Robot Design
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.