Skip to main content
iRubric: Art History Research Paper 21st Century Artist rubric

iRubric: Art History Research Paper 21st Century Artist rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Art History Research Paper 21st Century Artist 
Students will study a 21st Century artist. They will describe their Style, the history of the style, how they have adapted the style to fit their artwork. They will find an artist from the 20th century and compare and contrast their artist and his work with that of the 20th century artist.
Rubric Code: EX93266
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Art History Paper
  Outstanding

10 pts

Effective

8 pts

Competent/Fair

6 pts

Borderline

4 pts

Inadequate

2 pts

Fundamentally lacking/failing

1 pts

No paper presented

0 pts

Introduction paragraph

Outstanding

Demonstrating clear and concise understanding of the topic
Effective

Demonstrating reasonably clear and concise understanding of the topic
Competent/Fair

Demonstrating adequate topic coverage, and is fairly concise
Borderline

Inadequate but demonstrates some ability to introduce the topic, and is fairly concise
Inadequate

Very difficult to understand the topic, and is not concise
Fundamentally lacking/failing

Seriously lacking a clear topic, and is not concise
No paper presented
Point of view

Outstanding

a point of view and demonstrates strong critical thinking and research skills generally using appropriate examples, citations, reasons and other evidences to support its position and integrate one's own point of view
Effective

-effectively develops a point of view and demonstrates strong critical thinking and research skills generally using appropriate examples, citations, reasons and other evidence to support its position
Competent/Fair

-develops a point of view on a world dance form and demonstrates competent critical thinking and research skills using adequate examples, reasons,citations and other evidence to support its position
Borderline

-develops a point of view on a world dance form, and demonstrates some critical thinking and research skills but may do so inconsistently or uses inadequate examples, reasons, citations and other evidence to support its position
Inadequate

-develops a point of view on the world dance form that is vague or seriously limited, demonstrating weak critical thinking and poor research skills, providing inappropriate or insufficient examples, citations, reasons or other evidence to support its position
Fundamentally lacking/failing

-develops no viable point of view on the world dance form, or provides little or no evidence to support its position
No paper presented
Organization

Outstanding

-is well organized and clearly focused, demonstrating clear coherence and smooth progression of ideas
Effective

-is well organized and focused, demonstrating coherence and progression of ideas
Competent/Fair

-is generally organized and focused, demonstrating some coherence and progression of ideas
Borderline

-is limited in organization or focus, demonstrating lapses in coherence or progression of ideas
Inadequate

-is poorly organized and/or focused, or demonstrates serious problems with coherence or progression of ideas
Fundamentally lacking/failing

-is disorganized or unfocused, resulting in a disjointed or incoherent essay
No paper presented
Language/grammar

Outstanding

-exhibits skillful use of language, using a varied, accurate, and apt vocabulary
-demonstrates meaningful variety of sentence structure
-is free of most errors in grammar, usage and mechanics that clearly articulate meaning
Effective

-exhibits facility in the use of language, using appropriate vocabulary
-is generally free of most errors in grammar, usage and mechanics that strongly support meaning
Competent/Fair

-exhibits adequate but inconsistent facility in the use of language
-has a number of errors in grammar, usage and mechanics that support meaning
Borderline

-displays a developing facility in the use of language, but uses weak vocabulary or incorrect word choice
-contains an accumulation of errors in grammar, usage and mechanics that interfere with meaning
Inadequate

-displays very little facility in the use of language, using very limited vocabulary or incorrect word choice that persistently interfere with meaning
Fundamentally lacking/failing

-displays fundamental errors in vocabulary
-demonstrates severe flaws in sentence structure
-contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that persistently interfere with meaning
No paper presented
Page Length

Outstanding

Over page length requirement
Effective

Half Page under length requirement
Competent/Fair

One page under length requirement
Borderline

1 1/2 pages under length requirement
Inadequate

2 pages under length requirement
Fundamentally lacking/failing

2 1/2 or more pages under length requirement
No paper presented
Content of Paper

Outstanding

Paper includes all of the needed information. It is evident that the student has researched multiple facets of their artist and their style. Style, History of Style, ARtist Bio, Comparing and Contrasting, and Their personal take on the artist.
Effective

Paper is missing a 1-2 of the important categories that are to discussed with in the paper.
Competent/Fair

Paper is missing a 2-3 of the important categories that are to discussed with in the paper.
Borderline

Paper is missing a 3-4 of the important categories that are to discussed with in the paper.
Inadequate

Paper is missing a 4-5 of the important categories that are to discussed with in the paper.
Fundamentally lacking/failing

Paper is missing a 5-6 of the important categories that are to discussed with in the paper.
No paper presented
Set up of Paper

Outstanding

>Paper is MLA style format
>Paper is double spaced
>Times New Roman, 12pt
>Double Spaced
>Works Cited page is included
Effective

Paper is missing one of the requirements for set up
Competent/Fair

Paper is missing 2 of the requirements
Borderline

Paper is missing 3 of the requirements
Inadequate

Paper is missing 4 of the requirements
Fundamentally lacking/failing

Student has not set up the paper in the manner in which it was intended.
No paper presented
Participation:

Outstanding

Student demonstrated incredible work ethic for the duration of the project. Student completed 25 of the required note cards and went above and beyond with the research that they conducted.
Effective

Student demonstrated adequate work ethic. Completed 24-20 of their research note cards.
Competent/Fair

Student demonstrated fair work ethic. Student only turned in 20-15 of their required research note cards.
Borderline

Student demonstrated below average work ethic and turned in 10-15 of their required research note cards.
Inadequate

Student demonstrated poor work ethic. Only 5-10 note cards were completed while doing research.
Fundamentally lacking/failing

Student demonstrated no work ethic and did not turn in any of the assigned research note cards.
No paper presented



Keywords:
  • art history


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60