Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Spanish 4 P v I Spanish Game rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Spanish 4 P v I Spanish Game
Semester FINAL Project: Spanish (Board) Game
Objetivo: Crear un juego que practica el pretérito y el imperfecto para otros estudiantes. ¡Yo usaré el mejor juego este semestre con nivel 3 estudiantes!
Rubric Code:
EX3C892
By
hdwalters
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Academic Content
Poor
2 pts
Fair
6 pts
Good
13 pts
Super
20 pts
# Questions?Answers - Rough Draft
Poor
3 or more: late, incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging, inaccurate.
Fair
2 of the following: late, incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging, inaccurate.
Good
1 of the following: late, incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging, inaccurate.
Super
On time, thorough, relevant, good range of difficulty, show attention to detail, answers are accurate.
Accuracy of Content
Poor
Several pieces made for the game game are not accurate. It is unclear as to if the group understands the uses of P and I.
Fair
All but 2 of the informational pieces made for the game are correct.
It is somewhat clear the the group understands the P and I and how to present the information.
Good
All but one of the information cards made for the game are correct. P and I are well understood.
Super
All information cards made for the game are correct. Exellent uses of preterit and imperfect.
Instructional Effectiveness
Poor
The content is incidental. One can play without learning much.
Fair
Significant cognitive effort is spent on things that make the difficult to use as an instructional resource.
Good
Winning and learning are closely entwined, though some mental effort is spent on aspects that are just about the game.
Super
Winning the game requires learning the content. The two are matched completely.
Knowledge Gained
Poor
Several students in group could NOT correctly answer without looking up additional information.
Fair
Most students in group could easily and correctly participate in the game without looking at additional resources.
Good
All students in group could easily and correctly participate.
Super
All students in group could easily and correctly participate without looking at the game.
Use of Spanish
Poor
Irrevelant to the purpose and objective.
Fair
This Spanish is either:
A. Well over your head and shows signs of outside help.
B. Below average for the level you should be at.
Good
Most of the board, rules, etc. presented in Spanish with English translations if necessary.
It is your Spanish but some Spanish is not level appropriate
Super
Board, rules, etc. presented in Spanish with English translations if necessary.
This Spanish is totally appropriate for level 3. It is clearly your Spanish without cheating by using outside sources or plagriarism.
Participation (within group, ranked
Poor
Almost none.
Fair
Limited; made no effort to increase your own knowledge to help out.
Good
Made some effort but still left partner with the brunt of the work.
Super
Particpated fully and found ways to build on knowledge through process and/or helped partner gain more knowledge as well.
The Game Itself
Poor
2 pts
Fair
5 pts
Good
7 pts
Super
10 pts
Rules
Poor
Unwritten.
Fair
Rules were written, but people had some difficulty figuring out the game.
Good
Rules were written, but one part of the game needed slightly more explanation.
Super
Rules were written completely and clearly enough so that all could easily participate.
Creativity
Poor
Little thought was put into making the game interesting and fun.
Fair
The group tried to make the game interesting and fun, but some of the things made it hard to understand/enjoy the game.
Good
The group put some thought into making the game intersting and fun to play by interesting game peices or objective
Super
The group put a lot of thought into making the game fun and interesting to play as shown by creative questions, game pieces, and/or game board.
Others' Reactions
Poor
Ranked as unplayable.
Fair
Thought the game could use further development and then could be engaging.
Good
Found the game somewhat engaging and worthwhile, might play again!
Super
Found the game engaging and worthwhile, would play again!
Presentation of the Game
Poor
All group members<BR>
participated in the instrumentation of the game, understood the rules and objectives, and are able to communicate this with this class.
Fair
Member did not fully understand the instrumentation and objects of the game and was not totally prepared to communicate this with the class.
Good
Member had only a vague understanding of the instrumentation and objectives of the game and was not prepared to communicate with the class.
Super
Member had no role in communicating with the class.
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.