iRubric: Ancient Pharaoh Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Ancient Pharaoh Project Ancient Pharaoh Project Each group will present on a different Pharaoh as well as in a different manner. Rubric sections are to read as up to the amount of point (Ex. out of 5 for poor) Rubric Code: E87AA4 By rgough Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Ancient Pharaoh Presentation
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 10 pts	Good 15 pts	Fantastic 20 pts
Research/Subject Knowledge	Poor Group is missing critical parts of the background information on the Pharaoh	Fair Group is missing a few key pieces, however it is clear that research was completed on Pharaoh	Good Group demonstates knowledge of content at an expected level.	Fantastic Group has done a fantastic job splitting up research roles so that many key points of Pharaoh's life has been explained.
Organization	Poor It is clear that group in unorganized. Presentation is hard to follow.	Fair It appears that there is a lack of organization. The presentation is impacted by this.	Good The group seems well organized and it impacts the presentation.+	Fantastic It is obvious that the group is organized. Great job.
Requirements	Poor It is clear you didn't follow directions. In doing so the presentation isn't up to par	Fair It seems that you didn't follow all requirements. It is essential to follow all to recieve a good score	Good It seems that all requirements have been met and impact your presentation	Fantastic It is obvious that all requirements have been met, it shows in your presentation.
Group Work	Poor Group didn't work well together throughout the entire process	Fair Group struggled at times to work together but got the job done	Good Group did a good job working together and it is clear everyone had a key role	Fantastic group went above and beyond to prepare, they worked very well together without any issues
Presentation	Poor Group presentation was disappointing and wasn't complete	Fair Group lacked key presentation techniques and didn't meet all requirements	Good Group presented well and met all requirements	Fantastic Group presentation was fantastic. Every member contributed and play a key part in the delivery of this presentation