Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Journal Week 1 rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Journal Week 1
Rubric Code:
E727A9
By
tizlar
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Journal Week 1
Poor
0 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Journal Introduction
Poor
Does not include introductory information and/or information is incomplete or irrelevant.
Fair
Student director includes:
their last name,
The date on which they are writing,
the number of the entry (e.g., "Journal Entry #7)
Good
Student director includes:
their last name,
the date on which they are writing,
the number of the entry (e.g., "Journal Entry #7),
The topic of the entry (their idea, the name of the thing to which you are responding, or both), and
A title for the entry (Student directors can be creative).
Word minimum
Poor
Does not include a minimum of 300 words and/or information submitted is incomplete or irrelevant.
Fair
Includes a minimum of 250 words informal exploratory writing.
Good
Includes a minimum of 300 words of intensely focused but informal exploratory writing. Note: Maximum will vary depending on the questions prompts given.
Casting process
Poor
Student director oes not describe their casting process and/or information supplied is incomplete or irrelevant.
Fair
Student director generally describes their casting process. Specific examples to validate their conclusions are not included.
Good
Student director describes their casting process and/or reasoning for pre-casting using examples from the course lecture (auditioning /casting) and their independent audition experiences to validate their conclusion.
First read-through
Poor
Student director does not include and/or explain the impressions from hearing their first read-through aloud or the information submitted is incomplete or irrelevant.
Fair
Student directors include and explain their impressions from hearing their first read-through aloud.
Good
Student directors include and explain their impressions from hearing their first read-through aloud. Student directors include specifics such as quotes, actor responses, and includes pg. numbers to validate their conclusions.
Actors' inspiration
Poor
Information submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant.
Fair
Student director includes, yet fails to support the discoveries, comments, questions, and/or new ideas actors provide in the character conferences and/or first read-through.
Good
Student director includes and supports discoveries, comments, questions, and/or new ideas actors provide in the character conferences and/or first read-through.
Director's inspiration
Poor
Information submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant.
Fair
Student director includes, yet fails to support the discoveries, comments, questions, and/or new ideas they uncovered in the character conferences and/or first read-through.
Good
Student director includes and supports the discoveries, comments, questions, and/or new ideas they uncovered in the character conferences and/or first read-through.
Problem Solving
Poor
Information submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant.
Fair
Student director includes, yet fails to support the difficulties they foresee in their process. The student director's responses to difficulties focuses on emotion and/or elements out of their control.
Good
Student director includes and supports the difficulties they foresee in their process. Additionally, the student director devises a well-supported plan on how they plan to solve/overcome their difficulties. Answer solutions given lies in the student director's control.
Next rehearsal session goals
Poor
Information submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant.
Fair
Student director lists and supports their goals for the next rehearsal session. Student director fails to provide tangible quotes, units, and/or page numbers to validate their responses.
Good
The student director lists and supports their goals for the next rehearsal session. Student director provides tangible quotes, units, and/or page numbers to validate their responses.
Rehearsal sessions
Poor
N/A
Fair
N/A
Good
Posts from the journal responses include a minimum of one rehearsal/character interview session and a maximum of 6 rehearsal/ character interview sessions
Rehearsal Responses
Poor
Zero - half of the journal entries are posted in a timely fashion.
Fair
Over half of the journal entries are posted in a timely fashion. Hence, 5 out of 6, or 2 out of 3, etc..
Good
1-6 journal responses are posted immediately after the rehearsal/ independent character sessions have concluded and/or before 11:59 pm the day of rehearsal.
Subjects:
Humanities
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Humanities rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.