Skip to main content
iRubric: Journal Week 1 rubric

iRubric: Journal Week 1 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Journal Week 1 
Rubric Code: E727A9
By tizlar
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Journal Week 1
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Journal Introduction

Poor

Does not include introductory information and/or information is incomplete or irrelevant.
Fair

Student director includes:
their last name,
The date on which they are writing,
the number of the entry (e.g., "Journal Entry #7)
Good

Student director includes:
their last name,
the date on which they are writing,
the number of the entry (e.g., "Journal Entry #7),
The topic of the entry (their idea, the name of the thing to which you are responding, or both), and
A title for the entry (Student directors can be creative).
Word minimum

Poor

Does not include a minimum of 300 words and/or information submitted is incomplete or irrelevant.
Fair

Includes a minimum of 250 words informal exploratory writing.
Good

Includes a minimum of 300 words of intensely focused but informal exploratory writing. Note: Maximum will vary depending on the questions prompts given.
Casting process

Poor

Student director oes not describe their casting process and/or information supplied is incomplete or irrelevant.
Fair

Student director generally describes their casting process. Specific examples to validate their conclusions are not included.
Good

Student director describes their casting process and/or reasoning for pre-casting using examples from the course lecture (auditioning /casting) and their independent audition experiences to validate their conclusion.
First read-through

Poor

Student director does not include and/or explain the impressions from hearing their first read-through aloud or the information submitted is incomplete or irrelevant.
Fair

Student directors include and explain their impressions from hearing their first read-through aloud.
Good

Student directors include and explain their impressions from hearing their first read-through aloud. Student directors include specifics such as quotes, actor responses, and includes pg. numbers to validate their conclusions.
Actors' inspiration

Poor

Information submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant.
Fair

Student director includes, yet fails to support the discoveries, comments, questions, and/or new ideas actors provide in the character conferences and/or first read-through.
Good

Student director includes and supports discoveries, comments, questions, and/or new ideas actors provide in the character conferences and/or first read-through.
Director's inspiration

Poor

Information submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant.
Fair

Student director includes, yet fails to support the discoveries, comments, questions, and/or new ideas they uncovered in the character conferences and/or first read-through.
Good

Student director includes and supports the discoveries, comments, questions, and/or new ideas they uncovered in the character conferences and/or first read-through.
Problem Solving

Poor

Information submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant.
Fair

Student director includes, yet fails to support the difficulties they foresee in their process. The student director's responses to difficulties focuses on emotion and/or elements out of their control.
Good

Student director includes and supports the difficulties they foresee in their process. Additionally, the student director devises a well-supported plan on how they plan to solve/overcome their difficulties. Answer solutions given lies in the student director's control.
Next rehearsal session goals

Poor

Information submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant.
Fair

Student director lists and supports their goals for the next rehearsal session. Student director fails to provide tangible quotes, units, and/or page numbers to validate their responses.
Good

The student director lists and supports their goals for the next rehearsal session. Student director provides tangible quotes, units, and/or page numbers to validate their responses.
Rehearsal sessions

Poor

N/A
Fair

N/A
Good

Posts from the journal responses include a minimum of one rehearsal/character interview session and a maximum of 6 rehearsal/ character interview sessions
Rehearsal Responses

Poor

Zero - half of the journal entries are posted in a timely fashion.
Fair

Over half of the journal entries are posted in a timely fashion. Hence, 5 out of 6, or 2 out of 3, etc..
Good

1-6 journal responses are posted immediately after the rehearsal/ independent character sessions have concluded and/or before 11:59 pm the day of rehearsal.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60