Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Prezi Project for the Partial Exam rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Prezi Project for the Partial Exam
Rubric for assessing the prezi task for the partial exam
Rubric Code:
E5CWC6
By
roguigar
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
LANGUAGE
30 %
Poor
0.5 pts
Fair
1.5 pts
Good
2 pts
Grammar
Poor
Poor command of grammar. Several mistakes found in basic grammar patterns (agreements S-V, past forms of verbs, etc.)
Fair
Good command of most grammar patterns used. Some mistakes are identifiable but not in basic grammar (probably due to risk taking)
Good
Excellent command of grammar patterns used. No mistakes are evident in the presentation
Spelling
Poor
Poor command of spelling. Several mistakes found in basic vocabulary
Fair
Good command of spelling. Rare mistakes found in spelling.
Good
Perfect spelling in the presentation. No evident mistakes in the presentation
Coherence and Organization
Poor
Not enough information presented and no noticeable effort iat presenting the ideas clearly for the audience.The ideas are poorly organized and linked.
Fair
Good organization, there is a logical connection evident to the audience between and idea and the next although there are still some points that could be improved.
Good
Excellent organization, use of discourse markers in the text or other cohesive devices to emphasize the logical connection between and idea and the next The graphic organization reinforces the ideas presented in the texts.
USE OF PREZI
50 %
Technical effort to use the tools.
Poor
0.5 pts
Fair
1.5 pts
Good
2 pts
Path
Poor
No path created to navigate the presentation. Presenters must show the presentaton manually. Some of the elements in the path do not have much meaning.
Fair
Although there's visible effort done to create a path, some elements are left outside or are not shown as they should (images upturned, some images are shown but not the text)
Good
Well organized and clear, it shows clearly the organization of the ideas. The path works as it should presenting.
Images
Poor
Not enough images to illustrate the main points of the task. (Less than 5)
Fair
Good care in general terms in the selection of the images although some of them could be improved.
The number of images is the minimum required in the task. (5)
Good
Excellently choosen images. They successfully illustrate or reinforce the ideas presented. They go beyond the minimum required (more than 5)
Contrast
Poor
Poor or no contrast between text and background in most sections. Colors and background haven't been properly considered for facilitating reading.
Fair
Good contrast between text and background although there are occasions when an effort must be done to read the text.
Good
Excellent contrast between text and background. Colors have been carefully considered for facilitating reading.
Dramatic Effects
Poor
No thought seems to have been given to the use of dramatic effects to surprise or engage the audience.
Fair
Some effort done at engaging the audience although the effects do not surprise or could be technically improved (size of texts or images, concepts...)
Good
Impressive effects coming from the project as a whole (selection of images and videos, text and graphic presentation) The use of zooming reinforces the ideas presented.
Videos
Poor
No videos have been included or they are of poor quality. No much effort seems to have done on this point (the video seems to have been selected just for meeting the item)
Fair
The presentation has a video that is clearly related to the topic.
Good
More than one video included or really excellent choice for reinforcing the ideas presented.
Extension
Poor
Not enough information presented (15 steps, 1 video, images)
Fair
Just the minimum items presented (15 steps, 1 video, images)
Good
Abundance of information. The students went beyond the minimum expected.
TASK
20 %
Poor
0.5 pts
Fair
1.5 pts
Good
2 pts
Authors (credits)
Poor
No authors are mentioned in the presentation.
No credit is given to the authors of the resources included in the project.
Fair
The authorship of some resources is recognised although there are some elements that remain anonimous
Good
The authors of the presentation are mentioned in it as well as the source(s) of the materials employed(video, image, quotation if it applies)
Language Usefulness
Poor
The project has not much language usefulness either as explanation or example for prospective students.
Fair
Good
The project constitutes a good example or explanation for future students of English.
Keywords:
CALL, Prezi
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.