Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Written case analysis assessment rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Written case analysis assessment
Written case analysis assessment
Used for midterm exam and case write-ups when a students misses a class in 465B
Rubric Code:
E4CC25
By
tcardon
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Business
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Midterm case analysis
Poor
0 pts
Fair
1 pts
Good
2 pts
Analysis
42.5 %
Issues identification
3 pts
Poor
No key issues are identified
Fair
Some key issues are identified
Good
All key issues are identified
Issues analysis
3 pts
Poor
The analysis of issues is shallow or contains major flaws
Fair
The analysis of issues is mostly accurate, but lacking in depth OR The theoretical knowledge is not applied to the analysis or is applied inappropriately
Good
The analysis of the issues is thoughtful, thorough, and appropriately applies theoretical knowledge and practical experience
Stakeholders
2 pts
Poor
The situation is analyzed from the perspective of one stakeholder
Fair
The situation is analyzed from the perspectives of some key stakeholders in the case
Good
The situation is analyzed from the perspectives of all key stakeholders in the case
Alternatives
2 pts
Poor
Recommends a course of action without identifying alternatives
Fair
Identifies some alternative courses of action available to the protagonist but does not identify some important possibilities; AND/OR thoroughly analyzes some but not all identified alternatives
Good
Identifies several alternative courses of action available to the protagonist and analyzes each alternative thoroughly
Recommendations
42.5 %
Appropriateness
2.5 pts
Poor
The recommended course of action does not address any of the major issues of the case
Fair
The recommended course of action is appropriate to address some but not all major issues of the case
Good
The recommended course of action is appropriate to address the major issues of the case
Feasibility
2.5 pts
Poor
It is not reasonable to expect that the actors in the case could execute the recommendations
Fair
It is reasonable to expect that the actors in the case could execute the main recommendations
Good
It is entirely reasonable to expect that the actors in the case could execute the recommendations
Rigor
2.5 pts
Poor
Recommendations are not linked to or based on the analysis of the case AND/OR The consequences of the recommendations are not anticipated
Fair
Recommendations are in part linked to or based on the analysis of the case AND/OR Anticipated consequences of the recommendations are mentioned but not clearly explicated
Good
Recommendations are thoroughly linked to or based on the analysis of the case AND Anticipated consequences of the recommendations are clearly explicated
Principled leadership
2.5 pts
Poor
Recommendations for action reflect severe lack of understanding and/or application of principled leadership
Fair
Recommendations for action reflect some understanding and/or application of principled leadership
Good
Recommendations for action reflect thorough understanding and application of principled leadership
Written presentation
15 %
Clarity and persuasiveness
4 pts
Poor
Unclear, confused, and unpersuasive articulation and explication of ideas.
Fair
Somewhat clear and persuasive articulation and explication of ideas.
Good
Clear and persuasive articulation and explication of ideas.
Grammar and syntax
2 pts
Poor
Frequent or consistent improper English grammar, syntax, and/or usage.
Fair
Occasional improper English grammar, syntax, and/or usage.
Good
Proper English grammar, syntax, and/or usage.
Spelling and typographical errors
1 pts
Poor
More than three spelling or typographical errors
Fair
One, two, or three spelling or typographical errors
Good
No spelling or typographical errors
Formatting
1 pts
Poor
No use of formatting to enhance the text.
Fair
Modest use of bullet points, headings, and other formatting to structure the content, but not in a way that enhances its clarity.
Good
Uses bullet points, heading, and other formatting to structure the content and enhance its clarity.
Length
2 pts
Poor
The write-up is more than 20% too long
Fair
The write-up is up to 20% too long
Good
The length of the write-up is within the guidelines
Subjects:
Business
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Business rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.