iRubric: Microteaching Performance Assessment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Microteaching Performance Assessment Microteaching Performance Assessment Microteaching student performance rubric: Teaching Through Problem Solving Rubric Code: E3C5B8 By Facilitator Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Math Type: Homework Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Microteaching
	Excellent 25 pts	Good 22 pts	Fair 18 pts	Poor or Missing 13 pts
Written Lesson Plan	Excellent All components of lesson plan template are complete and well written	Good Most components of lesson plan template are complete and well written	Fair Some components of lesson plan template are complete and well written	Poor or Missing Very few components of lesson plan are complete, well written, or are missing
Content of Lesson	Excellent Content of lesson is grade level appropriate, related to a specific math standard, meets the stated objective, and is engaging for students	Good One of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson is grade level appropriate, related to a specific mathe standard, meets the stated objective, and is engaging for students	Fair Two or more of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson is grade level appropriate, related to a specific math standard, meets the objective, and is engaging for students	Poor or Missing Three or more of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson is grade level appropriate, related to a specific math standard, meets the stated objective, and is engaging for students
Instructional Components of Lesson	Excellent Candidate effectively incorporates the three-phase structure for teaching through problem-solving;all components of each phase are incorporated	Good Candidate incorporates the three-phase structure for teaching through problem-solving, but omits a component of one of the phases	Fair Candidate incorporates the three-phase structure for teaching through problem-solving, but two or more components are omitted from one or two phases	Poor or Missing Candidate ineffectively incorporates the three-phase structure for teaching through problem-solving
Quality of Presentation	Excellent Quality of voice, professional behavior, organization, handwriting, interaction with students, and overall presentation are evident.	Good One to two of the following are deficient: quality of voice, professional behavior, organization, handwriting, interaction with students, and overall presentation	Fair Three of the following are deficient : quality of voice, professional behavior, handwriting, interaction with students, and overall presentation	Poor or Missing Several of the following are deficient or unacceptable: quality of voice, professional behavior, handwriting, interaction with students, and overall presentation