iRubric: Join the Conversation (JTC) rubric

The essay supports a concise, unambiguous thesis based on rigorous research. The writing is organized to provide the reader with a carefully constructed argument. Voices expressing different and opposing views are addressed successfully. The title, introduction, and conclusion are particularly well crafted to pique interest and leave a powerful impression.

The essay supports an unambiguous thesis based on some research. The writing is somewhat organized and the argument can generally be followed, though with some challenges. There is some attempt to address opposing voices thought it may fall short. The title, introduction, and conclusion demonstrate effort at building interest and leaving a powerful impression.

The essay has a thesis though it may be ambiguous or based more on emotion than research. The writing is loosely organized and the argument is difficult to follow. Opposing voices are either not or inadequately addressed. The title, introduction, and conclusion may be inadequately developed.

Few if any errors in the use of academic writing conventions, including grammar, punctuation, vocabulary, and tone. Editing and proofreading clearly evident.

Several errors in the use of academic writing conventions, including grammar, punctuation, vocabulary, and tone, that generally do not impede readability. Editing and proofreading inconsistent.

Multiple errors in the use of academic conventions, including grammar, punctuation, vocabulary, and tone, that impede readability. Little evidence of editing or proofreading.