Skip to main content

iRubric: RUBRIC FOR CLINICAL CASE STUDIES

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
RUBRIC FOR CLINICAL CASE STUDIES 
Students are required to present an oral case study about one of their challenging clinical patients.
Rubric Code: E28X6A
By librice
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Rubric for Clinical Case Review
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Clarity of Presentation

Four Exams Data
Includes Looking, Asking, Listening and smelling and Palpation
Poor

Information gathered from intake is incomplete and disorganized.
Fair

Some information in some of the areas is coherent, but essential data is missing.
Good

Most of the relevant factors are organized and coherent.
Excellent

Complete and in-depth description of all 4 Exams which includes appearance, relevant answers to the 10 questions and pulse and tongue.
TCM Diagnosis

Patterns based on the Four Exams
Poor

Diagnosis is not included or is not based on evidence.
Fair

Some correlation between signs and symptoms and TCM diagnosis. Unable to narrow the focus to the most important patterns.
Good

Clear, organized and based on presenting signs and symptoms. Differentiation of patterns leading to one or two main areas of focus. Some supporting evidence missing.
Excellent

Comprehensive analysis of all the factors taken into account to arrive at the most relevant TCM pattern and its root cause. Demonstration and understanding of how multiple patterns interrelate.
Treatment Principles

Based on Diagnosis
Poor

Treatment Principles do not correspond to the diagnosis.
Fair

Partial understanding of how a TCM diagnosis leads to the Treatment Principle(s).
Good

Well thought out deduction of Treatment Principles based on TCM diagnosis.
Excellent

Comprehensive and in-depth discussion of the most relevant Treatment Principles based on a thorough understanding of the TCM Diagnosis.
Treatment Points

Poor

Treatment Points have no relationship to the Diagnosis and Treatment Principle(s)
Fair

Some points are understood to help the condition, while others may be in conflict with the Treatment Principle
Good

Points are relevant and will lead to an effective treament.
Some missing evidence.
Excellent

An in-depth understanding and cohesiveness about the choice of points being used.
Secondary Vessels

Application of Treatments in clinical practice
Poor

Choice of Secondary Vessel is inappropriate for patient ; Points and methods of treatment do not correspond to the Secondary Vessel chosen.
Fair

Accurate analysis of which Secondary Vessel is appropriate, but overall plan is weak.
Good

Well thought out analysis of the Secondary Vessel with effective choice of points and treatment protocol. Some difficulty anticipating possible reactions.
Excellent

Clear understanding of which Secondary Vessel would be most appropriate with an in-depth analysis of possible outcome.



Keywords:
  • Assessment, Clarity, Treatment Principles, Treatment Methods

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178