Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Science Teaching Unit rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Science Teaching Unit
Rubric Code:
E2854W
By
kharantschuk
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Science Teaching Unit
Excellent
5 pts
Good
3 pts
Poor
0 pts
Unit Structure
Excellent
The unit does include: a unit name, a suggested duration, the length of each class, the amount of classes per week, or the essential questions.
Good
The unit includes only some of the structural elements.
Poor
The unit does not include: a unit name, a suggested duration, the length of each class, the amount of classes per week, or the essential questions.
Lesson Plans
Excellent
The lesson plans include: the essential questions for the unit, doctrinal framework, standards, lesson objectives, material list, assessments, and process. Other sections are also included.
Good
The lesson plans include: the essential questions for the unit, doctrinal framework, standards, lesson objectives, material list, assessments, and process.
Poor
The lesson plans do not include all of the following: the essential questions for the unit, doctrinal framework, standards, lesson objectives, material list, assessments, and process. Sections are missing.
Use of Technology
Excellent
One lesson plan uses a power point presentation, united streaming, or a smart board lesson. The use of technology is creative and engages the students' learning process.
Good
One lesson plan uses a power point presentation, united streaming, or a smart board lesson, yet it does not fit into the sequencing of the class and/or is not age appropriate.
Poor
There is no use of technology in the unit.
Materials
Excellent
All of the materials were included, unless prior permission was given by the instructor to waive any of them.
Good
Some materials were included in the unit.
Poor
No materials were included in the unit.
Biography
Excellent
Includes all resources used to design the unit. This includes: lesson plans, rubrics, graphics, music, web sites, and movies.
Good
Does not include 2-3 resources used to design the unit. This includes: lesson plans, rubrics, graphics, music, web sites, and movies.
Poor
Does not include 4 or more resources used to design the unit. This includes: lesson plans, rubrics, graphics, music, web sites, and movies.
Curriculum/Activities
Excellent
Curriculum and activities are consistent with learning targets (essential questions, standards, doctrinal framework). The information in the curriculum is accurate and age appropriate. The activities/experimentsengage the students in a variety of the scientific processing skills to promote critical thinking.
Good
The curriculum and activities are weakly linked with learning targets (essential questions, standards, doctrinal framework). The information in the curriculum is accurate and age appropriate. The activities/experimentsdo not engage the students in a variety the scientific processing skills. Only 3 or less skills are used repeatedly.
Poor
Curriculum and activities are not consistent with learning targets (essential questions, standards, doctrinal framework). There are gross inaccuracies in curriculum. The acitivites are vague and do not promote highly level learning.
Differentiation
Excellent
Teaching/learning strategies and materials are varied. Consideration of students varied needs (challenged, gifted, cultural) is explicit. Curriculm and activities reflect a strong focus on higher level thinking.
Good
Little attention is given to differentiating instruction. Some of the factors are not considered, or all of the factors are suggested but lack consistency or meaning for actual use in the classroom.
Poor
No attention is given to diversity in any dimension.
Assessment
Excellent
A variety of assessment methods are used explicitly in the unit (preassessment, formative, summative).
Good
Only 2 areas of assessment are used in the unit. Or the 3 areas of assessment are used yet they interfer with the flow of the lesson plan, are not age appropriate, or do not support the learning targets.
Poor
Only 1 area of assessment is used in the unit. Or 2 areas of assessment are used yet they interfer with the flow of the lesson plan, are not age appropriate, or do not support the learning targets.
Organization, Grammar, Spelling
Excellent
Organization is very clear. There are no issues with grammar and spelling.
Good
The basic organization of the unit is complete and can be navigated. Grammar and spelling are adequate. There are no more than 5 spelling and/or grammar errors present in the unit.
Poor
The unit is poorly organized. There are frequent problems with grammar and spelling.
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.