iRubric: Integers Menu Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Integers Menu Project Integers Menu Project A general rubric to assess student projects that have been selected from a menu of choices. Rubric Code: E26C38 By msjetta12 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Math Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Integers Menu Project
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 8 pts	Fair 6 pts	Poor 4 pts
Completeness	Excellent All information needed is included. Product meets and/or exceeds all of the requirements.	Good Some important information is missing. Product meets most of the requirements.	Fair Most information is missing. The product meets some of the requirements.	Poor A great deal of information is missing. The product meets few of the requirements.
Creativity	Excellent Presentation of information is from an original perspective. Graphics are creative and original. Product includes an element of fun and interest.	Good Presentation of information is from an original perspective. Graphics are original. Product has elements of fun and interest.	Fair There is little evidence of creativity or originality in this product. Graphics are not original.	Poor There is no evidence of creativity or originality in this product.
Correctness:	Excellent All information presented in the product is correct and accurate.	Good Most information presented in the product is correct and accurate.	Fair Some information in the product is correct and accurate.	Poor Information in the product is incorrect and/or inaccurate.
Organization	Excellent All information is neat and easy to read. Product is in appropriate format and shows excellent effort.	Good Most of the product is neat and easy to read. Product is in appropriate format and shows significant effort.	Fair Product is legible, but shows little effort.	Poor Product is disorganized and difficult to read. Product shows no effort.
Time Management	Excellent Class time was managed extremely well. Student was always on task during work sessions and worked to the best of his/her ability. Student partners worked exceptionally well together and needed no reminders to stay on task.	Good Class time was managed well. Student was on task for the majority of the time during class work sessions and worked to the best of his/her ability. Student partners worked well together and needed only one or two reminders to stay on task.	Fair Class time was not managed well. Student was off task several times during class work sessions and did not work to the best of his/her ability. Student partners did not work well together and needed several reminders to stay on task.	Poor Class time was managed poorly. Student was off task most of the time during class work sessions and did not work to the best of his/her ability. Student partners were disruptive and had to be separated from one another.