Skip to main content

iRubric: Check Fraud Case Study rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Check Fraud Case Study 
This rubric provides a clear framework for assessing learners' abilities to identify and analyze potential fraudulent activities in check transactions. By using this scoring rubric, evaluators can ensure a consistent and objective assessment of learners' performance in the context of check fraud detection and analysis.
Rubric Code: E24A9WA
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Finance  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Check Fraud Case Study
  Non-Performance

1 pts

Below Expectations

2 pts

Basic

3 pts

Proficient

4 pts

Distinguished

5 pts

Check Prevention
4 %

Understanding of Check Fraud Signs

Non-Performance

Fails to demonstrate any understanding of signs of fake checks or identify suspicious transactions and common mistakes on fraudulent checks.
Below Expectations

Shows limited understanding of signs of fake checks and needs help identifying suspicious transactions or common mistakes on fraudulent checks.
Basic

Demonstrates a basic understanding of some signs of fake checks but needs to recognize suspicious transactions and common mistakes on fraudulent checks consistently.
Proficient

Shows a clear understanding of most signs of fake checks and can identify suspicious transactions and common mistakes on fraudulent checks in typical scenarios.
Distinguished

Demonstrates a thorough understanding of various signs of fake checks, including recognizing suspicious transactions, common mistakes on fraudulent checks, and altered checks in diverse scenarios.
Analyze
2 %

Analysis and Evaluation of Check Security Features

Non-Performance

Fails to analyze or evaluate check security features or identify potential fraud in check fraud scenarios.
Below Expectations

Shows limited ability to analyze and evaluate check security features and struggles to identify potential fraud or make informed judgments.
Basic

Demonstrates some capability in analyzing and evaluating check security features but struggles to identify potential fraud and make informed judgments consistently.
Proficient

Capably analyzes and evaluates most check security features, identifying potential fraud and making informed judgments in typical check fraud scenarios.
Distinguished

Analyzes and evaluates check security features precisely, effectively identifying potential fraud and making well-informed judgments in various check fraud scenarios.
Check Evauluation
2 %

Check Negotiability and Customer Account Information

Non-Performance

he learner fails to assess the checks' negotiability, utilize customer account information to determine suspicious activity, or make informed judgments.
Below Expectations

Shows limited ability to assess check negotiability and utilize customer account information, needing help to determine suspicious activity or make informed judgments.
Basic

Demonstrates some capability in assessing check negotiability and utilizing customer account information but needs help determining suspicious activity or making informed judgments consistently.
Proficient

Capably assesses check negotiability and utilizes customer account information to determine suspicious activity in most cases, demonstrating competence in making informed judgments.
Distinguished

Effectively can assess check negotiability and utilizes customer account information to accurately determine suspicious activity, demonstrating a high level of competence in making informed judgments.
Response to Potential Fraud
4 %

Non-Performance

Fails to respond to potential fraud based on fraud trends and current schemes or make any appropriate and effective decisions.
Below Expectations

Shows limited ability to respond to potential fraud based on fraud trends and current schemes, struggling to make appropriate and effective decisions.
Basic

Demonstrates some capability in responding to potential fraud based on fraud trends and current schemes but struggles to consistently make appropriate and practical decisions.
Proficient

Capably responds to potential fraud based on fraud trends and current schemes, mainly making appropriate and effective decisions.
Distinguished

Demonstrates an exemplary ability to respond to potential fraud based on fraud trends and current schemes, consistently making appropriate and effective decisions.
Overall Performance
1 %

Non-Performance

Fails to demonstrate performance across all criteria or understanding and application of check fraud detection and response.
Below Expectations

Demonstrates below expectations performance across all criteria, with significant weaknesses in understanding and applying check fraud detection and response.
Basic

This score shows basic performance across all criteria, with some areas of strength but also some noticeable weaknesses in understanding and applying check fraud detection and response.
Proficient

Displays mainly proficient performance across all criteria, demonstrating a solid understanding and application of check fraud detection and response.
Distinguished

Consistently demonstrates exemplary performance across all criteria, displaying a comprehensive understanding and application of check fraud detection and response.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n7