Skip to main content

iRubric: Film Evaluation and Review with Reflection rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Film Evaluation and Review with Reflection Film Evaluation and Review Provide a summary and analysis of the film(s). Write a personal response and reflection of the film, including if applicable the source it was based upon. Rubric Code: DXX8899 By DrNLopez Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Foreign Languages Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Qualities and Criteria These are the components of the paper that are evaluated.
	Unacceptable 0 pts	Poor This category will reflect that the student did not put forth effort or understanding of the assignment. Paper does not follow guidelines. No assistance was sought for problems. Potentially failing paper. 65 pts	Fair A paper of fair quality will show some effort but lack analysis or structure qualities as presented in the guidelines. 75 pts	Good A good paper has the general structure and mechanics expressed in the guidelines with a few areas of weakness. A good paper could be made excellent with help from learning resources. 85 pts	Excellent An excellent paper follow all guidelines clearly and shows significant thought and effort. If the student struggled with an area, assistance with improvement was found. Mechanics are near perfect. 100 pts
Format of Paper 10 % -Organization -Length -Font -MLA style	Unacceptable -No apparent format. -One or two page submission -No outline -Email, handwritten -Not in MS Word -Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.	Poor - Does not follow an organized outline of ideas - Length is too short or too long -Identified font is not used -Margins are not set -Pages not numbered	Fair -Some outline attempted in organization of ideas -Unclear transitions to new ideas -Length is not met or font is not appropriate	Good -Outline is clear in presentation of ideas -Appropriate length of paper -Correct font is used	Excellent -Very clear and organized ideas -Strong presentation of paper outline -Correct length -Correct font
Content of Summary of Film 20 % -Identifies characters -Notes main plot -Clear idea of what the film was about	Unacceptable -Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.	Poor -Does not give reader a summary of the film -Main characters and plot is not addressed -Glosses over, disorganized -not clear what the film is about	Fair -Gives a general idea of the film but lacks in clarity of the plot and characters -Too short, almost synopsis -Crucial Plot and Character actions not addressed -Provided spoilers and ending	Good -Gives detailed explanation of the film's main plot and characters extending beyond two paragraphs Addresses either plot twist or character's motive -Provided some spoilers of plot and character	Excellent -Gives reader a clear understanding of the film along with the main characters and plot in an appropriate amount of space that is no more than two paragraphs -Addresses plot twist and/or character's motive -Does not give away ending or spoilers
Analysis of Film 35 % -Relation to the topics discuss in class -Use of terminology from course -Shows critical thinking	Unacceptable -Quotes not identified and unacceptable. -No formal descriptions -Illustrations not included -Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.	Poor -Provides no critical thinking and only a summary of what occurred -Gives no relation to the course work or terminology -No focus on what caught the writer's attention	Fair -Uses some basic course terminology but limited critical thinking about the film's purpose, theme, actions, and/or conflict presented -no articulation of both films' purpose.	Good -Provides new perspective and relation to the issues addressed in the course -Uses terminology learned from the course in appropriate ways -Articulates director's, actor's vision, approach to the film adaption in one of the films	Excellent -Provides evidence of critical thinking -Avoids simple explanations of terminology but rather relates the terminology to the film and the purpose -Articulates director's, actor's vision, approach to the film adaptation on both films
Personal Reflection 20 % -Addresses personal reaction to film -Acknowledges any emotion or thought of a personal nature	Unacceptable -Nothing submitted -No reflection and/or reaction -Not the assigned task, off task	Poor -Very vague and no personal reaction included -Inappropriate use of reflection taking up majority of the paper -Disjointed	Fair -Some reflection but lacks in ability to relate to what was learned through the film	Good -Good overall reaction is presented -Reflection of what was personally learned from the film and the relation to the course	Excellent -Reflection flows well and integrates learning from the coursework as well as the film -Expression of some personal reaction to the film, the book, and the course (if applicable).
Mechanics 10 % -Grammar -Spelling -Punctuation	Unacceptable -Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.	Poor -Many spelling errors -Difficulty understanding ideas due to improper grammar -Significant punctuation errors	Fair -Spelling errors -Several grammatical errors -Punctuation errors	Good -Generally appropriate usage of grammar and punctuation -Evidence of spell check used	Excellent -Virtually free of grammar and spelling errors -Limited punctuation errors
Style 5 % -Vocabulary -Clichés -Use of qualifiers -Homonyms -Erudition	Unacceptable -Same as above -Full of clichés -Dominant use of qualifiers (very, often, hopefully, practically, basically, really, mostly) -No voice -Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.	Poor -Mismatch in tone -Too Wordy -Vague -Lots of qualifiers -Used two words that mean the same thing -Student's voice is lost because of abused of stock phrases	Fair -Tone is disjointed -Some wordiness -Some vague language usage -Opens with a cliché -Some qualifiers -Some homonyms -There is a glimmer of student's voice	Good -Appropriate tone -Appropriate and correct usage of vocabulary -Language usage is appropriate -Almost not qualifiers -Avoids clichés -Student's voice is present in various paragraphs	Excellent -Excellent tone -Vocabulary is simple, yet specific to paper -Avoidance of qualifiers or fillers -No clichés -No homonyms -Clearly the student has developed his/her own voice -Bravo, well done!

Subjects:

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Foreign Languages rubrics

More Writing rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202