Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Search and Rescue Robotics Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Search and Rescue Robotics Project
Tetrix Robotic Engineering
This rubric is designed to assess the design of the team's robot, based upon the following criteria: Design a Robot that can assist a Fire Rescue team by carrying up to 100lbs worth of equipment. Must be designed to navigate buildings, various terrains, small openings, and structural strength to support weight.
Rubric Code:
DXX3C3C
By
sykoyoyo
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Vocational
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8, 9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Robot Design Rubric
Needs Improvement
0 pts
Fair
3 pts
Good
7 pts
Excellent
10 pts
Innovative Design
5 %
Needs Improvement
Design and structure are standard.
Strategy for task expected and not very imaginative.
Fair
Design exhibits some creativity in terms of use but the robot's appearance is messy and can only accomplish a single task.
Good
Design creative; team exhibited some concern for look.
Unique/creative strategy for completing task(s); however, robot achieves only a few tasks.
Excellent
Design creative, both in function and appearance.
Robot is multi-functional.
Strategy, Process, Problem-Solving
15 %
Needs Improvement
No design process (initial concept, build, test, refinement).
Strategy based only on ease of task - did not maximize time, combine mission tasks or consider points.
Fair
Some forethought in initial design and process; however, refinement of robot not communicated.
Strategy often based on ease of task -few risks taken.
Good
Basic understanding of design process and conceptual planning, building, testing, refining of robot. Effective strategic planning with some challenging tasks.
Excellent
Communicates complete design process, from initial concept through build, test, and refinement.
Excellent/innovative strategy, combining mission tasks.
Locomotion & Navigation
20 %
Needs Improvement
Difficulty accomplishing same task on repeated missions; too fast or slow to accomplish task; movement inaccurate or inconsistent; use of remote awkward.
Fair
Accomplishes defined task sometimes; use of remote sometimes inconsistent and/or awkward.
Good
Accomplishes defined task most of the time; use of remote consistent and rarely awkward; pace of task natural and intentional.
Excellent
Accomplishes task(s) efficiently, consistently adjusting speed and position for optimum speed and accuracy.
Knowledge
5 %
Needs Improvement
Little knowledge of why some parts are located as they are on the robot; little or no understanding of what pieces did;
building appears primarily done by teacher.
Fair
Robot structure and programming shows minimal understanding of design; building seems primarily directed by teacher or certain team members.
Good
Robot structure and programming shows moderate understanding of underlying design;
building directed by team members, with help from teacher.
Excellent
Robot shows thorough understanding of underlying design;
building was accomplished by team members with little guidance from teacher.
Structural
5 %
Needs Improvement
Difficulty with robot assembly; base weak, falls apart when handled or run;
attachments weak and fall apart often; difficulty completing task.
Fair
Robot assembly done with few errors; robot base structure has some stability;
attachments difficult to apply.
Good
Slow robot assembly, with no errors; robot base stable, but not robust; attachments function most of the time conceptually;
Excellent
Robot assemble with no errors; robot base stable and robust; attachments function as expected; attachments perform tasks extremely well Conceptually.
Troubleshooting
10 %
Needs Improvement
None; team relies on teacher to solve all issues.
Fair
Team recognizes and identifies issues but makes few attempts to fix with little or no success.
Good
Team performs troubleshooting most of the time; moderate success getting robot to achieve attempted objectives.
Excellent
Team always performs troubleshooting without being asked and works on robotic design and features until objectives are achieved.
Robotics Show
30 %
Needs Improvement
Team was unprepared; visuals lacked information or were plain; presentation was unprepared; team lacked enthusiasm and appeared unprofessional.
Fair
Team was somewhat prepared; visuals were mostly informative and interesting; talk was somewhat prepared but could have used more enthusiasm.
Good
Team was mostly prepared; visuals were informative and interesting; team was enthusiastic and prepared.
Excellent
Team was very prepared; visuals were imaginative, colorful, and interesting; team was very enthusiastic and presentation was dynamic.
Team Player
10 %
Needs Improvement
None; detracts from unity and excellence.
Fair
Very little. Is cooperative and offers some ideas in group settings but does very little work or has to be directed by other members of the team.
Good
Can be a good leader. Is cooperative and occasionally helps others in group setting; takes the initiative to complete daily goals but needs some guidance.
Excellent
Excellent leader who leads team with all aspects of daily goals and construction; is agreeable and cooperative and not dominating.
Keywords:
Robot Design
Subjects:
Computers
Science
Vocational
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Computers rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.