Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Adventure Story rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Adventure Story
Rubric Code:
DX5666
By
czatell
Draft
Private Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Adventure Story
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Needs Improvement
0 pts
Plot/Events
10 %
Excellent
The story events show a definite and logical sequence.
Good
The story events are included, but are not necessarily entirely clear to the reader.
Fair
There are story events but they do not necessarily demonstate a flow.
Poor
There are story events but they lack elaboration.
Needs Improvement
There is no evidence of a specific plot and/or events.
Problem/Solution
10 %
Excellent
The story events show a definite problem and solution.
Good
The story events show evidence of a problem and solution, but are not necessarily as clear to the reader as they could have been.
Fair
The story events show evidence of a problem or solution.
Poor
The story events show a small attempt at a problem or solution.
Needs Improvement
There is no evidence of a definite problem and/or solution.
Dialogue/Exact Words
10 %
Excellent
The story includes logical dialogue for the characters and is punctuated correctly.
Good
The story includes logical dialogue which has minimal punctuation errors.
Fair
The story includes logical dialogue which has many punctuation errors.
Poor
There is minimal dialogue and it is not punctuated correctly.
Needs Improvement
There is no evidence of dialogue and/or exact words.
Snapshots/Show Us Don't Tell Us
10 %
Excellent
The author creates definite and consistent pictures throughout the story using strong voice (adjectives and verbs).
Good
The author includes a few attempts to paint pictures throughout the story using strong voice (adjectives and verbs).
Fair
The author attempts to paint pictures throughout the story, although they may use basic vocabulary to do so.
Poor
The author includes at least one attempt to paint pictures throughout the story although they may use basic vocabulary to do so.
Needs Improvement
The author did not "paint pictures" ie.: show us, instead of "telling us" the story.
Thoughtshots/Character's Thoughts
10 %
Excellent
The author includes definite logical thought processes of characters throughout the story. (What was going through their heads?)
Good
The author includes several thought processes of characters throughout the story.
Fair
The author includes a few thoughts of the characters involved throughout the story.
Poor
The author includes a thought of the at least one character.
Needs Improvement
The author did not include any thoughts of the characters.
Strong Verbs
10 %
Excellent
There is evidence of a major attempt at using strong (unique) verbs throughout the piece.
Good
There is evidence of a minor attempt at using strong (unique) verbs throughout the piece.
Fair
There is evidence of attempting to use a combination of some strong (unique) and many basic verbs throughout the piece.
Poor
The author used basic verbs throughout the piece.
Needs Improvement
Strong Adjectives
10 %
Excellent
There is evidence of a major attempt at using strong (unique) adjectives throughout the piece.
Good
There is evidence of a minor attempt at using strong (unique) adjectives throughout the piece.
Fair
There is evidence of attempting to use a combination of some strong (unique) and many basic adjectives throughout the piece.
Poor
The author used basic adjectives throughout the piece.
Needs Improvement
Transition Words
5 %
Excellent
There is evidence of a major attempt at using (unique)transition words throughout the piece to enhance the sequence of events.
Good
There is evidence of a major attempt at using (basic)transition words throughout the piece to enhance the sequence of events.
Fair
There is evidence of attempting to use some basic and unique transition words throughout the piece to enhance the sequence of events.
Poor
There is evidence of attempting to use some basic transition words throughout the piece to enhance the sequence of events.
Needs Improvement
The author did not use transition words.
Catchy Title
5 %
Excellent
The author's title was very catchy (interesting), and enticed the reader to want to know more.
Good
The author's title was somewhat interesting.
Fair
The author included a basic title.
Poor
Needs Improvement
Accurate Spelling
2 %
Excellent
It was obvious to the reader that spelling was carefully checked before final submission of the piece.
Good
It appreared to the reader that spelling was checked before final submission of the piece, although there may still have been minimal errors.
Fair
It appreared to the reader that spelling was checked before final submission of the piece, although there may still have been several errors.
Poor
There were numerous spelling errors throughout the piece.
Needs Improvement
It was obvious to the reader that spelling was not checked before final submission.
Accurate Punctuation
2 %
Excellent
It was obvious to the reader that punctuation was carefully checked before final submission of the piece.
Good
It appreared to the reader that punctation was checked before final submission of the piece, although there may still have been minimal errors.
Fair
It appreared to the reader that punctuation was checked before final submission of the piece, although there may still have been several errors.
Poor
There were numerous punctuation errors throughout the piece.
Needs Improvement
It was obvious to the reader that punctuation was not checked before final submission.
Accurate Capitalization
2 %
Excellent
It was obvious to the reader that capitalization was carefully checked before final submission of the piece.
Good
It appreared to the reader that capitalization was checked before final submission of the piece, although there may still have been minimal errors.
Fair
It appreared to the reader that capitalization was checked before final submission of the piece, although there may still have been several errors.
Poor
There were numerous capitalization errors throughout the piece.
Needs Improvement
It was obvious to the reader that capitalization was not checked before final submission.
Neatness
2 %
Excellent
The quality of neatness strongly indicates that the author used the alotted time wisely and took pride in the final submission.
Good
The quality of neatness moderately indicates that the author used the alotted time wisely and took pride in the final submission.
Fair
The quality of neatness mildly indicates that the author used the alotted time wisely and took pride in the final submission.
Poor
The quality of neatness indicates that the author may not have used the alotted time wisely, and but took some pride in the final submission.
Needs Improvement
The quality of neatness does not indicate that the author did not use the alotted time wisely and thus did not take pride in the final submission.
Appropriate Illustrations
2 %
Excellent
The quality of illustrations strongly indicates that the author took pride in the final submission.
Good
The quality of illustrations moderately indicates that the author took pride in the final submission.
Fair
The quality of illustrations mildly indicates that the author took pride in the final submission.
Poor
The quality of illustrations indicates that the author took some pride in the final submission.
Needs Improvement
The quality of the illustrations does not indicate that the author took pride in the final submission.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Add to Gallery
Let others view this rubric in Rubric Gallery.
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.