Skip to main content

iRubric: Social Media Evaluation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Social Media Evaluation Rubric Social Media Evaluation Rubric Rubric Code: DX453X2 By kielwmn Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Assessment Grade Levels: (none)

Enter rubric title
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Social Presence	Poor No social presence<BR> No physical contact<BR> *Acoustic, visual, and physical contact achieved not acheived<BR> Examples: Telephone converstations, email with just text/writing, and text messages with just text.	Fair Some social presence<BR> Some physical contact<BR> *Some acoustic, visual, and physical contact achieved<BR> Examples: Email with a picutre or audio attachment, text message with audio or video attachment	Good Acoustic, visual, and physical contact is achieved<BR> Examples: Face-to-face discussions, Skype, live chat
Media Richness	Poor Little to no information transmitted in a given time interval<BR> Ambiguity and uncertainty still exist<BR> *Examples: Unaddressed documents like bulk mail, posters, some letters and emails	Fair Some information transmitted in a given time interval<BR> Some ambiguity and uncertainty addressed, but more remains<BR> *Examples: Written, addressed documents such as some letters, emails, 2-way radio, and telephone conversations	Good Most if not all needed information is transmitted in a given time interval<BR> No anbiguity <BR> No uncertainty<BR> Examples: Video conferenceing and face-to-face interactions
Self-Presentation	Poor No control over the impressions other people form<BR> No objective influencing<BR> Image created is not consistent with one's personal identity<BR> Examples: Collaborative projects, content communities, and virtual game worlds	Fair Some control over the impressions other people form<BR> Some objective influencing<BR> *Image created is somewhat consistent with one's personal identity<BR> Examples:	Good Most if not total control over the impressions other people form<BR> Objective influencing is observed<BR> Image created is consistent with one's personal identity<BR> Examples: blogs, social networking sites, and virutal social worlds
Self-Disclosure	Poor Conscious or unconscious revelation of personal information is not consistent with the image one would like to give<BR> Examples: Collaborative projects, conent communities, and virtual game worlds	Fair *Conscious or unconscious revelation of person information is somewhat consistent with the image one would like to give	Good Conscious or unconscious revelation of person information if consistent with the image one would like to give<BR> Examples: blogs, social networkings sites, and virtual social worlds
Web 2.0	Poor Software is not continuously modified <BR> Users are not exhibiting participatory or collaborative effort.<BR> *No use of Adobe Flash, RSS, and/or AJAX	Fair Softwars is somewhat continuously modified <BR> Some users are exhibiting participatory or collaborative effort<BR> *Some use of Adobe Flash, RSS, and/or AJAX	Good Software is continuously modified<BR> Users are exhibiting participatory or collaborative effort<BR> *Use of Adobe Flash, RSS, and/or AJAX
User Generated Content	Poor Little to no media content publicly available<BR> Little to no media content created by end-users<BR> No creative effort<BR> Not created outside of professional routines and practices	Fair Some media content publicly available<BR> Some media content created by end-users<BR> Some creative effort<BR> Somewhat created outside of professional routines and practices	Good Most or all content publicy available<BR> Most or all media content created by end-users<BR> Creative effort<BR> Created outside of professional routines and practices
Collaboration	Poor Social media tool does not allow or support collaboration<BR> Tools and instructions are not clear<BR> *Accessibility by all devices and internet services is problematic	Fair Social media tool allows some collaboration<BR> Tool and instructions are somewhat clear<BR> *Accessibility is 50/50 with come barriers	Good Social media tool allows full collaboration<BR> Tools and instructions are easy to use and follow<BR> *Accessbility of the social media tool is not an issue
Privacy	Poor Social media tool has no privacy policy in place<BR> Users are not protected from any privacy invasion	Fair Social media tool has some privacy policies, but no all are effective<BR> Users are somewhat protected from privacy invasion	Good Social media tool has a well thought out privacy policy<BR> User are fully protected from privacy invasion
Cost	Poor Social media tool or application has a cost associated with its use that is too high <BR> Monthly or start-up fee	Fair Social media tool or application has a small yet manageable cost associated with its use<BR> No monthly or start-up fee	Good No cost associated with the social media tool or application<BR> No monthly or start-up fee
Accessibility	Poor Social media tool is not widely accessible <BR> Social media tool will not work with school filters<BR> Social media tool is only available on one type of device<BR> Not accessible by all Internet providers/services	Fair Social media tool is somewhat accessible<BR> Social media tool will sometimes work with school filters (unreliable)<BR> Social media tool is available on some devicesm, but not all<BR> Social media tool is accessible by some Internet providers/services, but not all	Good Social media tool has complete accessibility<BR> Social media tool will always work with school filters<BR> Social media tool is available for all devices<BR> Social media tool is accessible by all Internet providers/services
Monitoring/Moderating Settings	Poor Social media tool has no monitoring or moderating settings<BR> Content cannot be moderated/monitored by an administrator or parent	Fair Social media tool has a monitoring or moderating setting but it does not cover all content and is limited<BR> Some, but not all, content can be moderated/monitored by an administrator or parent	Good *Social media tool has a monitoring or moderating setting that covers ALL material/content and all material/content can be moderated/monitored by an administrator or parent
User/Responsibility Guidelines	Poor Social media tool has no user guidelines<BR> Social media tools provides no guidelines on how to use the tool responsibly and safely	Fair Social media tool has an incomplete user guideline section<BR> Social media tool has an incomplete guidelines section on how to use the tool responsibly and safely	Good Social media tool has a well thought out user guideline section<BR> Social media tool supplies guidelines on how to use the tool responsibly and safely
Copyright Guidelines	Poor Social media tool makes no mention of copyright guidelines<BR> Copyright material can be widely used without rules or moderation	Fair Social media tool makes some mention of copyright guidelines<BR> Some coyright material is allowed; little moderation	Good Social media tool outlines the copyright policy<BR> No copyright material is allowed and content posted will be monitored for copyright infringement

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Education rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178