Skip to main content

iRubric: Annotated Bibliography rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Annotated Bibliography Annotated Bibliography Rubric Code: DB9CW8 By nbiggs Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Enter rubric title
	Exemplary 10 points (N/A)	Above Average 6 - 9 points (N/A)	Adequate 5 points 19.99 pts	Poor 1 - 4 points 17.49 pts	Minimum Not Met 0 - 1 points 2.5 pts
Source(s) 10 points	Exemplary Correct sources for the assignment 15 sources cited and at least 10 are from journals with no more than 5 websites	Above Average Correct sources for the assignment 15 sources cited and 9 are from journals	Adequate Correct sources for the assignment 15 sources cited and less than 9 are from journals/or other appropriate sources	Poor Correct sources for the assignment Less than 15 sources cited	Minimum Not Met *Not the correct sources for the asignment
Bibliography Conventions 10 points	Exemplary Citations include all information demanded by APA style Citations are formatted per APA guidelines	Above Average Citations include all information demanded by APA style Citations are formatted per APA guidelines *Citations may have a few minor errors (e.g., minor formatting issue), but no recurring errors	Adequate Citations include most information demanded by APA style Citations are mostly formatted per APA guidelines *Citations may have a few recurring but minor errors (e.g., missing page number)	Poor Citations loosely follow APA guidelines Citations may have a few recurring but significant errors Possibly just a copy and paste from database Journal title or article title is missing	Minimum Not Met Citations are not formatted per APA guidelines Citations have many recurring and/or significant errors *Possibly only url is present or author and title
Writing Mechanics 10 points	Exemplary Grammar, punctuation, and spelling are correct Writing uses elevated academic diction and varies its syntax *Writing is clear and precise, avoiding vague general language as much as possible	Above Average Grammar, punctuation, and spelling are typically correct Writing uses some academic diction and varies its syntax *Writing is generally clear, but may include some vague or general language	Adequate Writing contains occasional errors in grammar or usage Writing uses less formal, but not overly casual diction Writing may include repetition of sentence structures or ideas Writing is understandable, but often overly general and occasionally vague	Poor Writing contains distracting errors in grammar or usage Writing uses more casual than formal diction *Writing may include repetition of sentence structures or ideas	Minimum Not Met Grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors are prominent Writing uses overly casual diction Writing includes repetition of sentence structures or ideas Writing is difficult to understand, and is often overly general and vague
Annotation 10 points	Exemplary Annotations are a clear and concise summary of the each source's main idea and argument Identifies strengths and weaknesses	Above Average Annotations describe the source’s main idea and supporting conclusions Identifies strengths and weaknesses *Annotations may lack needed clarity	Adequate Annotations describe the source’s main idea and conclusion Provides some discussion of strengths and weaknesses	Poor Annotations describe the source’s main idea and at least one sub point Provides inadequate discussion of strengths and weaknesses *Annotations may lack credible proof of understanding of source's content	Minimum Not Met Annotations are mere vague summaries that do not demonstrate any understanding of the source's content May ignore important points *Summary may be based solely from the abstract, no evidence that the source has been sufficiently reviewed.
Evaluation 10 points	Exemplary Desribes why each source is relevant to topic selected Describes how source will be used, making thoughtful connection/s	Above Average Describes why each source is relevant to topic selected Weak or not well thought-out connections	Adequate Describes why each source is relevant to topic selected Connection to topic is weak and may not make sense *Lacks clarity	Poor Describes why this source is relevant to research project Citation lacks sufficient connection to selected topic	Minimum Not Met Lacking completely or inadequate description of relevance to topic Lacks connection to topic selected

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178