Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Music History Research Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Music History Research Paper
Music History Research Paper
Research a composer/arranger in the genres of classical, jazz, or sacred music. Submit a 10-page, double spaced paper that is compliance with APA format by 3:00PM, Friday, January 10, 2014 . Include a works cited page with at least 5 resources used researching the paper. Paper will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research (Content), credibility of sources (quality of research), grammar and mechanics, and works cited.
Rubric Code:
DB8A87
By
ChrisDenman
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Music
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Music History Research Paper
Excellent
100 pts
Good
80 pts
Fair
60 pts
Poor
40 pts
Quality of research
100 pts
Excellent
--Cited 5 or more sources
--Sources reliable and properly cited.
--All information relevant to topic
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.
--Research in-depth and beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Good
--Cited at least 3 sources
--Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor.
--Most information relevant to thesis.
--Sufficient information provided
--Research of sufficient depth.
Fair
--Failed to cite at least 2 sources
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Some information relevant to thesis.
--Information provided to support some elements of topic
--Surface research.
Poor
--Failed to cite sources
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Some information relevant to thesis.
--Information provided to support some elements of topic
--Surface research.
Content
100 pts
Excellent
--an appropriate topic for research.
--Good Support of topic. Discussed Composer/Genre in depth and covered all important events.
--Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Good
--questionable topic for research.
--Support for topic sufficient, Discussion of Composer/Genre lacking depth and covered most important events.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Fair
--poor topic for research.
--Support for topic barely sufficient, Discussion of Composer/Genre is very vague and very few important events were covered.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Poor
--Topic doesn't meet specifications.
--Support for topic not sufficient, Discussion of Composer/Genre is not clear and no important events were covered.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Grammar, Mechanics and Format
100 pts
Excellent
--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No More than 2 spelling errors
-- No more than 2 punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met all style and min/max paragraph requirements
--Paper is at least 10 pages in length
--Title page is properly formatted
Good
-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No more than 4 spelling errors.
-- Fewer than 4 punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met most style and min/max paragraph requirements
--Paper is at least 8 pages in length
--Title page is properly formatted
Fair
-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--More than 6 spelling errors.
-- More than 6 punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Failed to meet style and/or min/max paragraph requirements
--Paper is at least 6 pages in length
--Title page is close to the proper format
Poor
-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--More than 8 spelling errors.
-- More than 7 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Failed to meet style and/or min/max paragraph requirements
--Paper is less than 6 pages in length
--Title page is missing
Works Cited
100 pts
Excellent
--All sources properly cited in Works Cited page.
-- No more than 2 errors in format or punctuation.
Good
--All sources properly cited in Works Cited page.
-- 4 errors in format or punctuation.
Fair
--Not all sources properly cited in Works Cited page.
-- More than than 6 errors in format or punctuation.
Poor
No works cited page
Keywords:
Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research
Subjects:
English
Music
Education
Types:
Project
Presentation
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.