Skip to main content
iRubric: ART ANALYSIS RUBRIC (Grades 7/8)

iRubric: ART ANALYSIS RUBRIC (Grades 7/8)

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
ART ANALYSIS RUBRIC (Grades 7/8) 
Rubric Code: DAA24A
By vwellman
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
  Excellent

3 pts

Good

2 pts

Fair

1 pts

Poor

0 pts

5. ANALOGY OR HAIKU

Creation of a Haiku, simile, or metaphor based on the artwork's imagery
Excellent

The Haiku has 3 lines, with the proper number of syllables in each line:5,7,5. The topic is clearly related to nature and includes vivid imagery. / Analogy-Characteristics are the same of item being compared and comparison is very accurate.
Good

The Haiku has 3 lines , 2 of which have the correct syllable count. The topic of the poem
is somewhat related
to nature and includes clear imagery. /Analogy-Characteristics compared are the same but not accurated comparisons.
Fair

The Haiku has 3 lines, but only 1 line has the correct number of syllables. The topic could be related to nature and includes some imagery. /Analogy- Characteristics compared are not the same for items compared.
Poor

The Haiku has 3 lines, but only 1 line has the correct number of syllables. The topic is not related to nature and includes no imagery. /Analogy- incorrect use.
6. QUESTIONING

creation of higher level thinking questions
Excellent

The questions are very well thought out, organized, and creative. The questions contain elaboration, extension, and/or evidence of higher-order thinking and relevant prior knowledge.
Good

The questions are thought out and organized. There is limited evidence of elaboration, extension, higher-order thinking, and relevant prior knowledge.
Fair

The questions are basic and there is partial evidence of higher level thinking.
Poor

The questions are too generic. There is no evidence of higher level thinking.
7.COMPARE/CONTRAST

Excellent

There are two very clear comparison examples (similarities) between the artists' styles of art. There are two very clear contrasting examples (differences) between the artists' styles of art.
Good

There is one clear comparison example (similarity) between the artists' styles of art. There is one clear contrasting example (difference) between the artists' styles of art.
Fair

There is a limited understanding of how to compare and contrast the artists' styles of art. The description is not that clear and detailed.
Poor

Student has not provided any comparison examples (similarities) or contrast between the artists' styles of art.
8. EVALUATION

Excellent

Judgements are based on a variety of facets at both the cognitive and effective levels and are highly supported. Judging is based on personal values/opinions. Very innovative ideas on ways to modify the artwork and/or title are included.
Good

Judgements are based on both cognitive and effective levels and are supported. Judging is based on personal values/opinions. Ideas on how to modify the artwork and/or title are included.
Fair

Judgements are limited in both cognitive and effective levels and show little support.
Poor

Judgements have little or no support.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232