Skip to main content

iRubric: Portfolio Stakeholder Communciation Section - Fall 2012 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Portfolio Stakeholder Communciation Section - Fall 2012 
Stakeholder Communication
This is the rubric for grading the Stakeholder Communication section of the Student Portfolios in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department. (v1.0, created 10/11 by DP, v2.0, revised 03/12 by HU, v2.1 revised 08/12 by TV)
Rubric Code: D9W2C5
By mcengin
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Reflection
33.33 %
  Exemplary/Excellent

5 pts

Accomplished/Good

4 pts

Developing/Fair

3 pts

Deficient/Poor

2 pts

Not Applicable

(N/A)

Setting / Context
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

References the project assignment and its relationship to the project goals, as well as the date of completion, timeliness of sub-mission, and co-workers.
Accomplished/Good

References the project assignment, date of completion, and co-workers involved.
Developing/Fair

References only the project assignment that lead to the portfolio entry.
Deficient/Poor

Does not describe the relationship of the portfolio entry with the overall project.
Not Applicable
Appearance
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Properly formatted word-processed document on “resume-quality” paper.
Accomplished/Good

Properly formatted word-processed document.
Developing/Fair

Neatly handwritten or unformatted type.
Deficient/Poor

Illegible or sloppy.
Not Applicable
Writing Mechanics
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Writing is free of grammatical and spelling errors.
Accomplished/Good

Writing is mostly free of grammatical and spelling errors.
Developing/Fair

Grammatical and spelling errors are present but do not detract from the reflection.
Deficient/Poor

Grammatical and spelling errors detract from the reflection. The FYS professor picks up the red pen to correct them…
Not Applicable
Reflection
2 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Summary, mastery of the category, and personal growth represented by the entry.
Accomplished/Good

Summary of the student’s contribution and an explanation of how the entry demonstrates the mastery of the category.
Developing/Fair

Pure summary of the student’s contribution to entry.
Deficient/Poor

Rambling gibberish. It appears the writer is trying to fill in empty space.
Not Applicable
Entry
66.67 %
  Exemplary/Excellent

5 pts

Accomplished/Good

4 pts

Developing/Fair

3 pts

Deficient/Poor

2 pts

Not Applicable

(N/A)

Quality of Communicatio
50 %
Initiative
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Maintains regular contact with the client, including initiating interaction.
Accomplished/Good

Initiates occasional contact with client.
Developing/Fair

Responds does not initiate contact.
Deficient/Poor

Does not initiate contact.
Not Applicable

Not Applicable
Responsiveness
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Strengthens and deepens the relationship with the client by providing them with consistent and accurate information about the status of the project, facilitating and encouraging interaction with the client concerning problems and challenges faced by the project, and planning and preparing for client visits.
Accomplished/Good

Responds quickly to client by phone, email, or writing.
Developing/Fair

Responds to direct requests from client.
Deficient/Poor

Neglects to respond to phone calls, emails, and/or written communication with the client.
Not Applicable

Not Applicable
Professionalism
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Very prepared, responsive, considerate, and professional when dealing with the client.
Accomplished/Good

Prepared, responsive, considerate, and professional when dealing with the client.
Developing/Fair

Lack of preparation or unprofessional behavior when dealing with client.
Deficient/Poor

Unprepared, uncommunicative, or disrespectful when dealing with the client.
Not Applicable

Not Applicable
Purpose & Content of Communication
50 %
Evaluation of Needs
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Shows strong and clear evidence of high sensitivity to a well-defined need as expressed by stakeholders.
Accomplished/Good

Shows good evidence of accounting for the expressed need.
Developing/Fair

Shows some evidence of taking into account the need.
Deficient/Poor

Shows no evidence of taking into account the need.
Not Applicable

Not Applicable
Results Assessment
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Presents results openly with ample opportunity for stakeholders to assess at checkpoints before the end of the semester.
Accomplished/Good

Presents most results with some opportunity for stakeholder assessment.
Developing/Fair

Presents some results for assessment, but they may not be clear or timely.
Deficient/Poor

Does not adequately present results for stakeholder assessment.
Not Applicable

Not Applicable
Improvements Based on Feedback
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Shows clear evidence of making significant improvements on the project as a results of stakeholder feedback.
Accomplished/Good

Shows good evidence of improvement to the project based on stakeholder feedback.
Developing/Fair

Shows some evidence of improvement - listens to stakeholder feedback.
Deficient/Poor

Shows no improvement based on stakeholder feedback.
Not Applicable

Not Applicable




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178