Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Proving History Site rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Proving History Site
Rubric Code:
D99WC2
By
Seffie
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
History
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8, 9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Proving History Site
Exceeds Expectations
10 pts
Excellent
9.4 pts
Good
8.7 pts
Fair
8 pts
Poor
6 pts
Guiding Philosophy
15 %
Exceeds Expectations
Guiding philosophy is thoroughly explained and is skillfully used as a framework from within which to view the rest of the information on the site. Examples are given and the origin and importance of the philosophy is explained completely.
Excellent
Guiding philosophy is well explained and is referred to throughout the site. Examples are given and/or the origin and importance of the philosophy is explored.
Good
Student makes an attempt to explain the Guiding philosophy. Student refers back to the philosophy in multiple places. The importance of the philosophy is discussed.
Fair
Student attempts to explain the guiding philosophy and attempts to refer to it in serval places on the site, but it may be done awkwardly or incorrectly.
Poor
Student makes little or no attempt to utilize the guiding philosophy as a way to analyze the course material.
Primary Sources
25 %
Exceeds Expectations
Student uses 3 original primary sources for each required category. The primary source types are varied (i.e. video, cartoon, photo, painting, text, music, audio). Each primary source is highly relevant to the category, is thoroughly explained, and is used to "prove" or strengthen the student's point.
Excellent
Student uses 2 original primary sources for each required category. The primary source types are varied (i.e. video, cartoon, photo, painting, text, music, audio). Each primary source is highly relevant to the category, is thoroughly explained, and is used to "prove" or strengthen the student's point.
Good
Student uses 3 primary sources for each required category, but they are not original. The primary source types are mostly varied (i.e. video, cartoon, photo, painting, text, music, audio). Each primary source is relevant to the category, is thoroughly explained, and the author at least tries to use the source to "prove" or strengthen the student's point.
Fair
Student uses 1-2 primary sources for each required category, but they are not original. The primary source types are somewhat varied (i.e. video, cartoon, photo, painting, text, music, audio). The primary sources may not always be relevant to the category or thoroughly explained, and the author may have difficulty using the source to "prove" or strengthen his/her point.
Poor
The student does not use primary sources in each of the categories and when primary sources are utilized, it is done so ineffectively.
Historical Analysis
25 %
Exceeds Expectations
All factual content is both entirely accurate and completely relevant to the thesis statement. Information is obtained from multiple sources and is synthesized neatly and coherently with quotes used effectively for emphasis.
Excellent
All factual content is accurate and relevant. Information is obtained from 2-3 sources and fits together well.
Good
There may be 1-3 errors in the factual content but 2-3 sources have been consulted and the student makes an attempt to weave them together.
Fair
There may have 4-5 errors, the student may have chosen to only use the course text for information, or the student may have been very unsuccessful in his/her attempt to weave together the information.
Poor
The student has more than five factual errors.
Thesis Statement
10 %
Exceeds Expectations
The thesis statement is a sophisticated, reflective, and completely elaborated answer to the essential question.
Excellent
The thesis statement is well written and elaborative.
Good
The thesis statement is well written but the student does not elaborate upon their answer.
Fair
The thesis statement is weak or lacks focus.
Poor
There is no thesis statement.
Citations
5 %
Exceeds Expectations
The citations are in the correct format, both in text and on the citations page. Primary and secondary sources are separated.
Excellent
The citations are in the correct format, both in text and on the citations page. Primary and secondary sources may not be separated.
Good
The citations are mostly in the correct format, both in text and on the citations page. Primary and secondary sources may or may not be separated. There are 1-3 errors.
Fair
There are more than 3 errors in the citations.
Poor
There are very few citations or are entirely in the wrong order.
Site Appearance
15 %
Exceeds Expectations
The site appears professional. Graphics are used to the fullest extent and information is seamlessly integrated. The website is user friendly. All project requirements are met with finesse.
Excellent
The website meets all project requirements and is user friendly. It is evident that the student used his/her full creativity when designing the site.
Good
The website meets all project requirements, is user friendly, and is attractive.
Fair
The website meets most of the requirements but is not user friendly. There is little evidence of creativity.
Poor
The website appears incomplete. Links don't work and information is inaccessible.
Grammar/Mechanics/Spelling
5 %
Exceeds Expectations
There are no grammatical errors and the language used is sophisticated without being overly wordy or "flowery."
Excellent
There are 1-3 grammatical/spelling errors. The writing flows smoothly through the whole site.
Good
There 4-6 spelling and/or grammatical errors. The writing flows smoothly most of the time.
Fair
There are 7-9 spelling or grammar errors and the writing is somewhat choppy at various points.
Poor
There are more than 9 spelling/grammar errors and writing is choppy over most of the site.
Subjects:
History
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More History rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.