Skip to main content
iRubric: Analysis (Character) rubric

iRubric: Analysis (Character) rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Analysis (Character) 
Rubric Code: D7W3A8
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric DIRECTING PROMPT BOOK
  Unsastisfactory

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Excellent

(N/A)

POINT EARNED

(N/A)

Character
  Unsatisfactory

0 pts

Poor

10 pts

Fair

30 pts

Good

50 pts

Excellent

70 pts

POINTS EARNED

(N/A)

Super Objective

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements
Poor

Student lists strong objective of the character(s), yet fails to list the super objective
Fair

Student effectively list the super objective of the characters
Good

Student effectively lists the super objective of some characters in the play/ scene selection
Excellent

Student lists and supports super objective of all characters in the play by using internal/external sources to support conclusion drawn
POINTS EARNED
Desire

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements
Poor

Student provides a general statement of what the character(s) wants most
Fair

Student provides a clear statement of what the character(s) wants most
Good

Student supports and provides a clear statement of what the character(s) wants most
Excellent

Student supports and provides a clear statement of what the character(s) wants most. Statement is not superficial.
POINTS EARNED
Will

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements
Poor

Student provides general statement of the characters' relative strength in attaining their desires
Fair

Student provides a specific statement of the characters' relative strength in attaining their desires
Good

Student provides and support a specific statement of the characters' relative strength in attaining their desires
Excellent

Student provides and support a specific statement of the characters' relative strength in attaining their desires. Specifically answers questions: 1. How strong or weak is his/her inner strength?
2. Is it strong enough to push him/her to the full limit or will he compromise?
POINTS EARNED
Moral Stance

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements
Poor

Student includes a general description of the characters' values
Fair

Student includes a general description of the characters' values and describes how his/her moral stand will affect the attainment of his/her desires
Good

Student includes a general description of the characters' values and describes how his/her moral stand will affect the attainment of his/her desires. Student includes a description of how honest the character is with others and his/herself. Additionally, does the character(s) have a sense of moral responsibility to others?
Excellent

Student includes a general description of the characters' values and describes how his/her moral stand will affect the attainment of his/her desires. Student includes a description of how honest the character is with others and his/herself. Additionally, does the character(s) have a sense of moral responsibility to others? Finally, what is the moral code that governs his/her inner behavior? What is his/her sense of integrity?
POINTS EARNED
Decorum

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements
Poor

Student includes a general description of their interpretation of the character's physical appearance -- what s/he looks like, his/her manners, and his/her poise.
Fair

Student includes a specific description of their interpretation of the character's physical appearance -- what s/he looks like, his/her manners, and his/her poise.
Good

Student includes a specific and clearly supported description of their interpretation of the character's physical appearance -- what s/he looks like, his/her manners, and his/her poise. Also, student includes a list of the characters' physical characteristics seemingly required by the given circumstances.
Excellent

Student includes a specific and clearly supported description of their interpretation of the character's physical appearance -- what s/he looks like, his/her manners, and his/her poise. Also, student includes a list of the characters' physical characteristics seemingly required by the given circumstances. Lastly, student includes a written description of how the character(s) walk, how the character(s) stand, how the character(s) speak, etc.
POINTS EARNED
Summary adjectives

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements
Poor

N/A
Fair

N/A
Good

N/A
Excellent

Student summarizes all of the categories above using adjectives only. Do not set down a character's dramatic actions but only the traits the character reveal.
POINTS EARNED
Initial character-mood-intensity

1. Heartbeat: rate
2. Perspiration: heavy, light, etc.
3. Stomach condition
4. Muscle tension
5. Breathing: rate, depth

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irrelevant to course assignment requirements
Poor

Student provides a general sense of the physical or "body-state of the character" -- his/her nervosity (each character in scene must be included)
Fair

Student provides a general sense of the physical or "body-state of the character" -- his/her nervosity at the beginning of each scene (each character in scene must be included)
Good

Student provides a detailed sense of the physical or "body-state of the character" -- his/her nervosity at the beginning of each scene (each character in scene must be included)
Excellent

Student provides detailed descriptions clearly supporting the characters' nervosity at the beginning of each scene and/or unit
POINTS EARNED
Dialogue
  Unsatisfactory

0 pts

Poor

10 pts

Fair

30 pts

Good

50 pts

Excellent

70 pts

POINTS EARNED

(N/A)

Choice of words

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant to course assignment requirements
Poor

Student generally includes choice of words for the playwright and/or character. Information is not supported and/or efficiently evaluated.
Fair

Student effectively evaluates the choice of words the playwright and/or character(s) uses in select acts, and/or scenes, yet does not support and/or evaluate the choice of words for the play in its entirety.
Good

Student effectively evaluates the choice of words the playwright and characters within the script use in which to tell the story. Evaluation is supported and cited using internal/ external sources.
Excellent

Student effectively evaluates the choice of words the playwright and characters within the script use in which to tell the story. Environmental facts, such as the economic, social, and religious factors are built upon effectively in written discussion.
POINTS EARNED
Phrases and sentence structure

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant to course assignment requirements
Poor

Student generally evaluates the choice of phrases and sentence structures used within selected play. Additionally, student generally evaluates the structure of lines and speeches found within the script. Information stated is not well supported.
Fair

Student effectively evaluates the choice of phrases and sentence structures used within selected play. Additionally, student will evaluate and support the structure of lines and speeches found within the script.
Good

Student effectively evaluates the choice of phrases and sentence structures used within selected play. Additionally, student evaluated the structure of lines and speeches found within the script using the script as a catalyst of discussion.
Excellent

Student effectively evaluates the choice of phrases and sentence structures. Additionally, student will evaluate the structure of lines and speeches found within the script using the script as a catalyst of discussion. Student will provide a strong written summary while listing how this information acquired has helped their interprettion and/or will aid in communicating more effectively with their actors. External sources are used and cited.
POINTS EARNED
Choice of images

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or irrelevant to course assignment requirements.
Poor

Choice of image(s) is general and is not supported by internal and/or external sources.
Fair

Choice of image is specific yet is not well supported by internal and/or external sources.
Good

Choice of image is specific and is well supported by internal sources.
Excellent

Choice of image is specific and is well supported by internal and external sources. Sources utilize are cited.
POINTS EARNED
Peculiar characteristic

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or irreverent to course assignment requirements
Poor

Peculiar characteristics of characters found within the script is generally stated.
Fair

Peculiar characteristics of characters found within the script is specifically stated.
Good

Peculiar characteristics of characters found within the script is stated and supported using tangible evidence from the script.
Excellent

Peculiar characteristics of characters found within the script is stated and supported using tangible evidence from the script and external sources.
POINTS EARNED
Idea
  Unsatisfactory

0 pts

Poor

10 pts

Fair

20 pts

Good

50 pts

Excellent

70 pts

POINTS EARNED

(N/A)

Theme Statement

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irreverent to course assignment requirements
Poor

Student includes a general If/then statement.
Fair

Student includes a general If/then statement and supports statement using internal sources.
Good

Student includes a specific If/then statement and supports statement using internal and/or external sources.
Excellent

Student includes a specific major and minor If/then statement and supports statements using internal and/or external sources.
POINTS EARNED
Meaning of Title

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irreverent to course assignment requirements
Poor

Student includes a general idea expressing the meaning of title and/or states "a meaning does not exist"
Fair

Student includes a general idea expressing the meaning of title and supports it generally using evidence from the script
Good

Student includes a specific idea expressing the meaning of the title and supports it generally using evidence from the script
Excellent

Student includes a specific idea expressing the meaning of the title and supports it specific using evidence from the script and/or external sources
POINTS EARNED
Technical elements
  Unsatisfactory

0 pts

Poor

10 pts

Fair

30 pts

Good

50 pts

Excellent

70 pts

POINTS EARNED

(N/A)

Groundplan

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is irreverent to course assignment requirements
Poor

Groundplan is designed to accommodate a proscenium stage.
Fair

Groundplan is designed to accommodate a proscenium stage. Groundplan has at least 3 acting areas.
Good

Groundplan is designed to accommodate a proscenium stage. Groundplan has at least 5 acting areas. The Groundplan supports the dramatic action.
Excellent

Groundplan is designed to accommodate a proscenium stage. Groundplan has at least 5 acting areas. The groundplan supports the dramatic action of the piece and is well balanced. A concise summary of groundplan and dramatic action is included and internal/external support is clearly given.
POINTS EARNED
Miscellaneous
  Unsatisfactory

0 pts

Poor

10 pts

Fair

30 pts

Good

50 pts

Excellent

70 pts

POINTS EARNED

(N/A)

Bibliography

Unsatisfactory

Sources are not cited
Poor

Sources are listed and/or improperly cited
Fair

Some sources are listed and properly cited using MLA format
Good

All sources are listed yet are improperly cited using MLA format (books, articles, webpages, photos, etc.)
Excellent

All sources are listed and properly cited using MLA format (books, articles, webpages, photos, etc.)
POINTS EARNED
Livebinder

Unsatisfactory

Student does not submit work and/or work submitted is incomplete and/or is irrelevant to course assignment requirements
Poor

Student updated the LiveBinder to include sites explored. LiveBinder has at least 1 website explored.
Fair

Student updated the LiveBinder to include sites explored. LiveBinder has at least 3 websites explored.
Good

Student updated the LiveBinder to include the websites explored. LiveBinder has at least 5 websites explored.
Excellent

Student consistently updated the LiveBinder to include the websites explored. LiveBinder has at least 7 websites explored.
POINTS EARNED





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60