Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: ANATOMY CH.4 SKIN & BODY MEMBRANES rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
ANATOMY CH.4 SKIN & BODY MEMBRANES
Rubric Code:
D727C8
By
MGHAIRSTON
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Biology
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Background
Excellent
Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from card to card and is appropriate for the topic.
Good
Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from card to card.
Fair
Background does not detract from text or other graphics.
Poor
Background makes it difficult to see text or competes with other graphics on the page.
Originality
Excellent
Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way
Good
Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way
Fair
Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on 1-2 cards
Poor
Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought.
Content - Accuracy
Excellent
All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors
Good
Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be inaccurate.
Fair
The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate
Poor
Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error.
Sequencing of Information
Excellent
Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next card.
Good
Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One card or item of information seems out of place.
Fair
Some information is logically sequenced. An occasional card or item of information seems out of place.
Poor
There is no clear plan for the organization of information.
Use of Graphics
Excellent
All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation
Good
A few graphics are not attractive but all support the theme/content of the presentation.
Fair
All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation.
Poor
Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation.
Cooperation
Excellent
Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively all of the time
Good
Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively most of the time.
Fair
Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively some of the time
Poor
Group often is not effective in delegating tasks and/or sharing responsibility.
Effectiveness as a Teaching Tool
Excellent
Project includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the topic. It is a highly effective study guide.
Good
Project includes most material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the material but is lacking one or two key elements. It is an adequate study guide
Fair
Project is missing more than two key elements. It would make an incomplete study guide.
Poor
Project is lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies that make it a poor study guide.
Knowledge of Material
Excellent
Presentation illustrates an accurate and thorough understanding of scientific concepts
Good
Presentation illustrates an accurate understanding of most scientific concepts
Fair
Presentation illustrates a limited understanding of scientific concepts
Poor
Presentation illustrates inaccurate understanding of scientific concepts
Preparedness
Excellent
Group is completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed.
There is no reading of slides, referral to note cards is acceptable
Good
Group seems pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals
There is little to no reading of slides, but moderate dependence of note cards
Fair
The group is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking.
There is moderate reading of slides and/or heavy dependence on note cards
Poor
Group does not seem at all prepared to present.
Students are totally reliant on slides to present information.
Question & Answer
Excellent
All of Group was able to address questions in detail. Ability to answer is consistent across the group
Good
All questions are answered but one or two members of the group show weakness in ability to answer
Fair
Questions unanswered or group relies heavily on one or two members to fill in the blanks...
Poor
More than one question unanswered or answered incorrectly. Heavy dependence on one or more members of group ....to carry group through
Subjects:
Biology
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Biology rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.