Skip to main content
iRubric: ANATOMY CH.4 SKIN & BODY MEMBRANES rubric

iRubric: ANATOMY CH.4 SKIN & BODY MEMBRANES rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
ANATOMY CH.4 SKIN & BODY MEMBRANES 
Rubric Code: D727C8
By MGHAIRSTON
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Background

Excellent

Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from card to card and is appropriate for the topic.
Good

Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from card to card.
Fair

Background does not detract from text or other graphics.
Poor

Background makes it difficult to see text or competes with other graphics on the page.
Originality

Excellent

Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way
Good

Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way
Fair

Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on 1-2 cards
Poor

Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought.
Content - Accuracy

Excellent

All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors
Good

Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be inaccurate.
Fair

The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate
Poor

Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error.
Sequencing of Information

Excellent

Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next card.
Good

Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One card or item of information seems out of place.
Fair

Some information is logically sequenced. An occasional card or item of information seems out of place.
Poor

There is no clear plan for the organization of information.
Use of Graphics

Excellent

All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation
Good

A few graphics are not attractive but all support the theme/content of the presentation.
Fair

All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation.
Poor

Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation.
Cooperation

Excellent

Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively all of the time
Good

Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively most of the time.
Fair

Group delegates tasks and shares responsibility effectively some of the time
Poor

Group often is not effective in delegating tasks and/or sharing responsibility.
Effectiveness as a Teaching Tool

Excellent

Project includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the topic. It is a highly effective study guide.
Good

Project includes most material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the material but is lacking one or two key elements. It is an adequate study guide
Fair

Project is missing more than two key elements. It would make an incomplete study guide.
Poor

Project is lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies that make it a poor study guide.
Knowledge of Material

Excellent

Presentation illustrates an accurate and thorough understanding of scientific concepts
Good

Presentation illustrates an accurate understanding of most scientific concepts
Fair

Presentation illustrates a limited understanding of scientific concepts
Poor

Presentation illustrates inaccurate understanding of scientific concepts
Preparedness

Excellent

Group is completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed.

There is no reading of slides, referral to note cards is acceptable
Good

Group seems pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals

There is little to no reading of slides, but moderate dependence of note cards
Fair

The group is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking.

There is moderate reading of slides and/or heavy dependence on note cards
Poor

Group does not seem at all prepared to present.

Students are totally reliant on slides to present information.
Question & Answer

Excellent

All of Group was able to address questions in detail. Ability to answer is consistent across the group
Good

All questions are answered but one or two members of the group show weakness in ability to answer
Fair

Questions unanswered or group relies heavily on one or two members to fill in the blanks...
Poor

More than one question unanswered or answered incorrectly. Heavy dependence on one or more members of group ....to carry group through




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232