Skip to main content

iRubric: PowerPoint Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
PowerPoint Presentation PowerPoint Presentation Rubric This rubric is meant to assess the creation of your PowerPoint presentation project. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when composing the final grade for this assignment. The criteria for information is explained on the assignment outline. Rubric Code: D645C9 By dkubic Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Grading Rubric
	Superior 3 pts	Excellent 2 pts	Fair 1 pts	Poor 0 pts
1. Content	Superior Slides contain relevant information. Content is based on information in the text. Content includes additional detailed information found in further researching the topic.	Excellent Slides with some relevant information. Topic is somewhat discussed but more information is required. Content includes a few additional points found in further researching the topic.	Fair Slides contain minimal information relevant to topic.Topic is slightly discussed but more material is needed. Content does not include additional information found in further research.	Poor Slides do not contain relevant information. Topic is addressed but not discussed or elaborated on.
2. Graphics/Presentations Boards	Superior Slides are attractive. Text is legible. No grammatical errors. Graphics and effects are used throughout to enhance presentation. Information is at the advanced level and consistently supports images.	Excellent Slides are attractive. Text is legible. No grammatical errors. More than half of the slides use graphics and effects to enhance presentation. Information adequately supports images.	Fair Slides are legible. Amount of text is too great for the amount of space provided. Some grammatical errors. Less than half the slides have graphics or effects. Information supports images at times.	Poor The slides are not legible. The amount of text is too great for the space provided. There are several grammatical errors. There is little use of graphics or effects. The information does not consistently support images.
3. Presentation/Organization	Superior The presentation is well coordinated. All material is presented using language that is original. Speakers are well informed and elaborate beyond the displayed material.	Excellent The presentation is well coordinated. Most material is presented in new form and not as it is written on the screen.	Fair The presenters make minimal eye contact with the audience. Everything is read directly from the screen or page.	Poor The presenters make no contact with the audience. Everything is read directly from the screen of page.
4. Overall Presentation grade	Superior All required criterion is met and goes above and beyond instructor expectations of presentation.	Excellent Most required criterion is met and meets some instructor expectations.	Fair Some required criterion is met and meets some instructor expectations.	Poor Lack of required criterion adherence and instructor expectations are not met.
6. Creativity	Superior Creativity was demonstrated in various ways, IE., transitions, images, slide designed on at least 90% of the slides.	Excellent Creativity was demonstrated in various ways, IE., transitions, images, slide designed on at least 80% of the slides.	Fair Creativity was demonstrated in various ways, IE., transitions, images, slide designed on at least 50% of the slides.	Poor Creativity was demonstrated in various ways, IE., transitions, images, slide designed on less than 50% of the slides.
7. Dress Code	Superior Dress Code was met according to prior directions	Excellent	Fair	Poor Dress Code was not met according to prior instructions
8. Sound	Superior The speaker spoke so 100% of the class could hear the presentation clearly without difficulty	Excellent The speaker spoke so that 95% of the class could hear the presentation clearly without difficulty	Fair The speaker spoke hat 90% of the class could hear the presentation clearly without difficulty	Poor The speaker spoke so less than 90% of the class could hear the presentation clearly without difficulty
9. Font	Superior Font meets requirement 100%: Size, number of words oer slide, readability,	Excellent Font meets requirements 90%: Size, number of words oer slide, readability	Fair Font meets requirements 70%: Size, number of words oer slide, readability	Poor Font meets requirements less than 70%: Size, number of words oer slide, readability
10. Slide Slide number	Superior Slide number was exactly perfect for the length of the presentation, with no slide displayed to short of time, or too long. Timing of slides was exactly correct.	Excellent Slide number was almost perfect for the length of presentation, 1 slide displayed was too short or too long on time. At least one slide's timing was not exact for the presentation	Fair 2 of the slides length was too short or too long for the presentaton. Slide's timing was slightly off for the presentation	Poor 2 or more of the slides did not match the timing of the spoken word and
11. Slide design	Superior Each slide demonstrated thought, creativity, and, accurately portrayed the spoken word. The slide visually conveyed the spoken word	Excellent Each slide demonstrated thought, creativity, and all but one accurately portrayed the spoken word. The slide visually conveyed the spoken word.	Fair Each slide demonstrated thought, creativity, the majority of the time accurately protrayed the spoken word. The slide visually conveyed the spoken word.	Poor More than one slide did not demonstrated the following: thought, creativity, protrayal of the spoken word, or did not visually convey the spoken word.
12. Presentation Style	Superior The speaker did not directly read for more than 30 seconds from either the Powerpoint or notecards during the presentation. Eye contact was at the expected level, and the presenter only used the PowerPoint/ notecards for a quick referral anytime during the presentation.	Excellent The speaker did not directly read for more than 40 seconds from either the Powerpoint or notecards during the presentation. Eye contact was significantly at the expected level, and the presenter only used the PowerPoint/ notecards for a quick referral anytime during the presentation.	Fair The speaker did not directly read for more than 1 minute from either the Powerpoint or notecards during the presentation. Eye contact was genrerally at the expected level, and the presenter only used the PowerPoint/ notecards for a quick referral anytime during the presentation.	Poor The speaker directly read for more than 1 minute from either the Powerpoint or notecards during the presentation. Eye contact was occasionally at the expected level. The presenter used the PowerPoint/ notecards for more than a quick referral during the presentation.
13. 3 Fundamental	Superior 3 Fundamental factors were included and were each explained completely & clearly.	Excellent 3 Fundamental factors were included and each were signifcantly explained completely and clearly.	Fair 3 Fundemental factors were included and each were mostly explained completely and clearly.	Poor Less than 3 Fundamental factors were included, or 1 or more were not completely explained or clearly.
14. Exhibit in Presentatio	Superior The presentation of the exhibit fit naturally into the presenation, there was no drag in time, and was explained fully during the presentation.	Excellent The presentation of the exhibit fit somewhat naturally into the presenation, there was virtuallly no drag in time, and was explained fully during the presentation.	Fair The presentation of the exhibit mostly fit naturally into the presenation, there was a slight pause in time, as it was explained during the presentation.	Poor There was no exhibit, or the presentation of the exhibit did fit naturally into the presenation. There was significant pauses in time while trying to explainhow the exhibit related to the presentation.
15. 3 Elementsl of Presentation	Superior The exhibit, PowerPoint, & Presentation were closely and completely related. The 3 elements showed time, thought, creativity, originality, and purpose. The 3 were so closely related that they seemed as one	Excellent The exhibit, PowerPoint, & Presentation were closely and significantly related. The 3 elements showed time, thought, creativity, originality, and purpose. The 3 were so closely related that they seemed as one	Fair The exhibit, PowerPoint, & Presentation were closely and mostly related. The 3 elements showed time, thought, creativity, originality, and purpose. The 3 seemed to be disconnected at times	Poor At least one part was not complete of the exhibit, PowerPoint, & Presentation. There were items that did not connect and completely related. The 3 elements did not reflect time, thought, creativity, originality, and purpose. The 3 seemed to be disconnected at times
16. Time	Superior 4:55 - 5:15 Minutes	Excellent 4:45 - 4:55	Fair 4:30 - 4:44	Poor Less than 4:30, had to be stopped at 5:15
17. Directions	Superior 100% of all directions were followed	Excellent 95% of directions were followed	Fair 90% of directions were followed	Poor Less than j90% of directions were followed
18. Overall	Superior Everything in the 5 minutes presentation showed exceptional quality, style, creativity, originality, and crictical thinking.	Excellent The 5 minutes presentation showed significant quality, style, creativity, originality, and critctal thinking.	Fair The 5 minutes presentation showed mostly quality, style, creativity, originality, and critical thinking.	Poor The 5 minutes presentation lacked in at least one aspect ofquality, style, creativity, originality, and critical thinking.

Keywords:

PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Business rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202