- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Research Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Research Paper English Paper The student is asked to write a research paper on one of the great American or English writers. Student should provide background on the writer, along with writing style and general knowledge of works. Rubric Code: D4BWX4 By alabsher88 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: 9-12

Research Paper
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 3 pts	Poor 0 pts
Grammar/Punctuation	Excellent Little to no grammatical/punctuationmistakes throughout the entire paper.	Good 2-3 grammatical/punctuationmistakes.	Poor 4(+) grammatical/punctuationmistakes
Development	Excellent Information is developed very well. The paper has a clear thesis, which carries on into the body and conclusion of the paper.	Good Thesis needs work. Somewhat difficult to see where the subject will be developed.	Poor Thesis is very unclear or does not exist.No development of information pertaining to subject.
Flow of Paper	Excellent The paper flows in a very cohesive manner. The transitions from each theme flow perfectly, and reader can easily follow along.	Good There are some errors in flow, but overall possible to follow. Needs work on transitions and flow of themes.	Poor Not easy to follow. There is little no no flor in the paper. Poor use of transitions.
References	Excellent 4-5 References, all cited correctly.	Good 3-4 References, all cited correctly	Poor 0-3 References, only one cited correctly.
Overall Impression	Excellent Paper was well organized.Followed guidelines carefully, and was an imformative and enjoyable paper to read. Paper was submitted by deadline.	Good Paper was organized, but had minor formatting errors. Subject matter could use some work.Paper was submitted by deadline.	Poor Paper was not organized and did not follow format. Paper was not turned in at the deadline.
Peer Review	Excellent Student responded to two of his/her classmates research paper. Student was thorough in providing constructive criticism. Student also gave detailed feedback of the paper, and gave helpful ideas and remarks.	Good Student responded to two of his/her classmates papers. Student was adequate in providing feedback, but lacked in detail. Could have provided more effective criticism and included more ideas/comments.	Poor Student responded to one or none of his/her classmates research papers. Student provided little to no detail about classmate's paper(s), nor was any constructive criticism provided.