Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Rubric for Interview
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Rubric for Interview
Criteria for Interviewing Skills
Interview conducted by one student with another student "acting" as the main character from the novel.
Rubric Code:
D3B49X
By
Jacqueline522
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criteria for Interviewing Skills
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Questions were clear
Poor
Questions were broad and confusing to the informant.
Fair
Questions explained with familiar language but didn't completely communicate what the researcher wanted.
Good
Complex questions were not used so that the informant felt comfortable enough to share their experiences in the online classroom.
Open Ended Questions
Poor
Questions could be answered with a "yes" or "no".
Fair
Most but not all questions were answered with "yes" or "no"
Good
Questions led to discussion without "yes" or "no" answers.
Interviewer's neutral
Poor
Leading questions were given constantly.
Fair
Some questions were leading and some responses of the interviewee were received as leading.
Good
Ethics was used because it is unethical for the interviewer to form opinions. The interviewer remained neutral.
Social skills
Poor
Interviewer rushed through the interview, speech was difficult to hear or understand ,did not pay attention to the person interviewed, and/or was not polite to the person interviewed.
Fair
Interviewer paid some attention to the person interviewed, speech was sometimes too quiet or hard to understand, and/or the interviewer was impolite some of the time.
Good
Interviewer was polite.
Interviewer did not speak too fast or too slowly.
Interviewer was attentive to the answers and questions of the person interviewed.
Questions generated answers
Poor
Interviewee got off track and didn't stay on the main idea being researched.
Fair
Guiding questions were used but did not reflect the purposes of the interview
Good
Great questions and guiding questions were used to keep the informants talking.All the research wasn't addressed but a portion of the research was addressed.
Substance
Poor
The interview was too brief and missed a lot of the information presented in the text.
Fair
Covered at least half of the information presented in the text, but could have done more.
Good
Nice fluency. Covered the majority of the book from beginning to end.
Punctuality
Poor
Presentation was 2 or more days late.
Fair
Presentation was 1 day late.
Good
Presentation was ready on time or before the due date.
Subjects:
Communication
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.