- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: The Glass Castle - Irony Scavenger Hunt rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
The Glass Castle - Irony Scavenger Hunt Explanation and Justification Rubric Students are to re-read Part 1 - "A Woman on the Street" and identify, analyze, and explain instances of irony in the text. Rubric Code: D2WX63W By sramnarace Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: 9-12

The Glass Castle- Irony
	Excellent 90-100 (N/A)	Good 80-89 (N/A)	Fair 70-79 (N/A)	Poor <60 (N/A)
Irony Analysis Accurate types of irony chosen	Excellent Can accurately recognize multiple types of irony in the text, and has at least 4 examples.	Good Can accurately recognize a multiple types of irony in the text, and has at least 3 examples.	Fair Can mostly accurately recognize a multiple types of irony in the text, and has at least 3 examples.	Poor Has difficulty accurately recognizing exmaples of at least 2 types of irony in the text.
Reasoning and Explanation Are there enough reasons that are appropriate, clear , convincing, and relevant to type of irony chosen?	Excellent Reasons and support are appropriate and relevant to the category, adequate in number and development, clear and convincing with excellent justifications.	Good Reasons are appropriate and relevant though perhaps needing more reasons, or some need more development in order to be convincing and a better justification may be needed	Fair Reasons and support make sense but need clarity, development, or some are not relevant to the category and justifications are absent or not suitable	Poor Reasons are inadequate, irrelevant, or far too brief and undeveloped and justifications are absent
Evidence Evidence to support claims on irony	Excellent The student provides the strongest, irrefutable evidence, in the form of direct quotes with accurate citations.	Good The student provides mostly strong evidence, in the form of direct quotes with accurate citations.	Fair The student provides some strong evidence, in the form of direct quotes with mostly accurate citations.	Poor The evidence provided to support claims are weak, and/ or not cited.
Style and Grammar Is the expression and language mature and engaging?	Excellent The writing is confident, compelling	Good The writing is clear and mature overall with few errors	Fair The writing is uncertain at times with some errors or a pattern of errors that cause distraction and language that is overly colloquial	Poor The writing struggles throughout and the vocabulary is limited