iRubric: Geometry History Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Geometry History Presentation Italian History Project The students are to present important facts surrounding the history of Geometry. Rubric Code: D249A3W By bthomas7337 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Math Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

History This rubric describes the requirements that each student is to meet in order to gain full points for history project.
	Excellent 15 pts	Good 10 pts	Average 8 pts	Poor 6 pts
Presentation Medium Selection of digital application used as the medium for the presentation is suitable to its content and structure	Excellent Superior selection, both aesthetically pleasing and more than suitable for the presentation.	Good Appropriate selection that may be more functional than it is aesthetically pleasing.	Average Functional but seriously lacking in aesthetics and/or suitability.	Poor Inadequate choice, significantly lacking in aesthetics and suitability.
Introduction Topic Statement: Explains subject; Defines time periods involved; Locations; Flows well.	Excellent Contains all requested information.	Good Missing ONE component, does not "flow".	Average Missing TWO components, does not "flow".	Poor Missing THREE or more components, does not "flow".
Body Each paragraph has a topic sentence correlating to the topic, "flows", focused on paragraph topic, contains supporting evidence and important dates. Establishes a fluid timeline of importance and contribution(s) for each civilization and chosen individual.	Excellent Points given for each paragraph. Scored same as above	Good Points given for each paragraph. Scored same as above.	Average Points given for each paragraph. scored same as above.	Poor Points given for each paragraph. scored same as above.
Citations/grammar Uses appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation.	Excellent Same as above.	Good Same as above.	Average Same as above.	Poor Same as above.
Length Must meet minimum number of slides required in project instructions.	Excellent Same as above.	Good Same as above.	Average Same as above.	Poor Same as above.