Skip to main content

iRubric: Common Core Video Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Common Core Video Presentation Common Core Video Presentation Students will create a video demonstrating a task learned in the Collision, Refinishing and Detailing class. Rubric Code: CXXCA3A By Roop_G4 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Vocational Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Common Core Standards 100 % Common Core Standards: RL: 1,3, 5 RI: 7 W: 2A,2B,2C,2D,2F,3A,3B,3C,3D,3E,4,6,8,10 SL:1A,1B,1D,4,5 L:2,6 RST: 2,3,4,7,8,9 WHST: 2A,2B,2C,2D,2E,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts	Not Complete 0 pts
Plot	Excellent Script has an indepth, complete, logical story with a beginning, middle and end. Script also references multiple instructional manuals and informational sources. Script contains no error in content.	Good Script is complete, logical story with a beginning, middle and end. 1-2 instructional resources are referred too. Script contains one error in content.	Fair Script is complete with a few rough spots; needs more length. 0-1 instructional resources are referred to throughout video. Script contains 2 errors in content.	Poor Script is incomplete with major gaps; length is too short or too long. No instructional resources or manuals are referred too. Script contains multiple errors in content.	Not Complete No script was turned in.
Grammar	Excellent There were no grammar / spelling errors	Good There were few (1-2) grammar / spelling errors	Fair There were many grammar / spelling errors (3-4)	Poor There were numerous errors that made it difficult to understand (5-7)	Not Complete More than 8 errors.
Pronunciation/Dialogue	Excellent Group is fluent, pronounces all words correctly. Uses complex ideas, native-like flow of speech. Group uses industry terminology where applicable.	Good In the group almost all words were pronounced correctly with the exception of 1-2 words. Uses more complex language, but with pauses or chunks. Group uses industry terminology 3 or more times	Fair In the group some words were pronounced correctly with the exception of 3-4 words. Uses simple sentences.1-2 industry terminology was used.	Poor In the group many words were pronounced incorrectly. 5-6 words were pronounced incorrectly. Language is choppy and disconnected. Group used industry terminology incorrectly.	Not Complete 7 + words were pronounced incorrectly. No industry terminology was used. .
Acting & Originality	Excellent Great clarity, voice projection, no laughing that obscures scene, speaking in complete sentences. Unique and exciting. Team does not read from script. Maintains eye contact with the camera.	Good Voices are clear, lacks eye contact with camera. Narration not read from script and able to keep attention of audience. Team interacts with each other to tell a story.	Fair Voices do not maintain clarity and focus. Narration able to maintain audience attention. Interaction with team flows smoothly indicating structure and organization in planning.	Poor Missing more than 2 elements or you can't understand or hear. Lacks originality and effort. Constantly reads from script or forget lines.	Not Complete Missing all elements. No planning and rehearsal. Video lacks organization and ability to entertain audience.
Use of Technology	Excellent Excellent editing. Different scenes in film flow together naturally. The overall product is very convincing and well thought out.	Good Good editing. There is good flow between scenes. The end result is well adapted and convincing.	Fair Adequate editing. Some aspects of film do not flow together well. The end result is convincing but more direction and fluidity is needed.	Poor Poorly edited. Film does not flow/not convincing. Parts are hard to understand or lack structure or direction. Not well thought out.	Not Complete No editing. No movie.
Teamwork	Excellent All members contributed an equal significant role to the film/presentation.	Good All members contributed to the project, but some members did not play as significant a role in the production as a whole.	Fair All members al least contributed something. Some members are far less prominent in the production and video than others.	Poor Not all members contributed to the project. or one or more of the project members contributed almost nothing to the production.	Not Complete No members contributed to the project.
Speaking Requirement	Excellent All members met the speaking requirement	Good Only some members met the speaking requirement	Fair Fewer than 2 members met the speaking requirement.	Poor Only one person met the speaking requirement	Not Complete One member dominated speaking.
Camera Presence	Excellent -Maintains eye contact with his/her audience. -Stands straight while giving the presentation. -Does not lean on the podium or table in front of him/her.	Good -Ocassional eye contact with the audience. -Makes an effort to remain standing erect. -Ocassionaly leans on the podium or table in front of him/her.	Fair -Poor eye contact with audience. -Bad posture when presenting. -Constantly leans on podium or table in front of him/her. -Plays or fidgets with the paper or item in his/her hand	Poor -No eye contact with audience. -Remains unerect through the presentation. -Constantly distracted by the item(s) in his/her hand	Not Complete No participation
Speaking	Excellent -Speaks loud and clear.	Good -Speaker used a somewhat low voice	Fair Speaker muffled and distorted.	Poor -Speaker was barely audible.	Not Complete -Speaker could not be heard at all.
Preparation	Excellent Very well prepared. Team utilized props and diagrams which are very detailed to clarify their topic. Props and visuals greatly enhanced presentation.	Good Prepared. Few props used with good details. More visuals should be used to clarify topic.Props and visuals enhanced presentation.	Fair Somewhat prepared. Props not well organized and laid out. More time should have been put in prop design and use. Props and visuals helped presentation.	Poor Little or no props and visuals used. Props and visuals had little or no effect on enhancing presentation.	Not Complete Not prepared at all. Props and visuals not carefully planned or match with presentation topic.
Safety	Excellent Safety issues addressed in video. Team adheres to all safety precautions.	Good Safety issues addressed in video. Team did not adhere to one safety rule.	Fair Safety issues addressed in video. Team did not adhere to more than one safety rule.	Poor Safety issues not adequately addressed in video. Multiple safety rules not followed.	Not Complete Safety not covered at all in video.
Procedures	Excellent Team followed all required procedures accurately. Steps explained in proper order.	Good Team follows procedures but steps are not listed in proper order.	Fair Team followed some procedures. Steps not performed in correct order. One or more procedures missing.	Poor Team did not follow proper procedures. Multiple errors in presentation.	Not Complete Team did not follow proper procedures.
Q and A	Excellent Team adequately answered all questions asked.	Good Team were able to answer all questions but missing key points in answers.	Fair Team were not able to answer individual questions,	Poor Team was not Able to answer multiple questions.	Not Complete Team answered no questions.

Keywords:

Video, Common core

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Foreign Languages rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n52