Skip to main content
iRubric: Extended Definition Essay rubric

iRubric: Extended Definition Essay rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Extended Definition Essay 
Define a common but subjective term and explore what that word means via specific examples from Frankenstein and others that illustrate your definition.
Rubric Code: CXW2WW6
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric
  Excellent

20 pts

Good

18 pts

Fair

16 pts

Poor

14 pts

Introduction (Organization)

Excellent

The introduction is inviting, states the main topic and previews the
structure of the paper.
Good

The introduction clearly states the main topic and
previews the structure of the paper, but is not<BR>
particularly inviting.
Fair

The introduction states the main topic, but does not adequately preview
the structure of the
paper nor is it particularly inviting.
Poor

There is no clear
introduction of the main topic or structure of the
paper.
Definition

Excellent

clear and well defined extended definition; does an exemplary job of
supporting thesis
Good

An extended definition has been created; does a good job of supporting thesis
Fair

An extended definition is
created. The author attempts to support a thesis.
Poor

An extended definition is
attempted; little support for thesis.
Focus on Topic

Excellent

Topic is clear, well-focused. Main idea / Theme stands out and is
supported by detailed information.
Good

Main idea / Theme is clear but the supporting
information is general.
Fair

Main idea / Theme is
somewhat clear but
there is a need for
more supporting
information.
Poor

The main idea /theme is not clear.
There is a seemingly
random collection of
information.
Support for Topic

Excellent

Relevant, telling, quality details give the reader important information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable. At least one example per idea presented.
Good

Supporting details
and information are
relevant, but one key
issue or portion is unsupported. Not all ideas have evidence support.
Fair

Supporting details and information are relevant, but several key issues or portions are unsupported.
Poor

Supporting details and information are typically unclear or not related to the topic.
Sequencing

Excellent

Details are placed in
a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader. A variety of thoughtful transitions are used. They clearly show how ideas are connected.
Good

Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in which they are presented/introduced
sometimes makes the writing less interesting. Transitions clearly show how ideas are connected, but there is little variety.
Fair

Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader. Some transitions work well; but connections between other ideas are fuzzy.
Poor

Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is
organized. The transitions between ideas are unclear or nonexistent.
Conclusion

Excellent

The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is "getting at."
Good

The conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends.
Fair

The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends.
Poor

There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends.
Voice and Personality

Excellent

The writer seems to
writing from knowledge or
experience. The author has taken the ideas and made them "his own."
Good

The writer seems to be drawing on knowledge or experience, but there is some lack of ownership of the topic.
Fair

The writer relates some of his own knowledge or experience, but it adds nothing to the discussion of the topic.
Poor

The writer has not tried to transform the information in a personal way. The ideas and the way they are expressed seem to belong to someone else.
Sentence Fluency

Comma splices, run-ons, fragments.

Excellent

Every paragraph has sentences of different types, and all sentences are correctly punctuated.
Good

All paragraphs have sentences that vary in length but there are minor problems in punctuation with a few sentences.
Fair

Some sentences vary in length, or there are several sentences with punctuation errors.
Poor

Sentences rarely vary in length or there are frequent errors in punctuation.
Word Choice

Clarity of expression

Excellent

Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind;words seems accurate, natural and not forced.
Good

Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind; occasionally the words are used inaccurately or seem overdone.
Fair

Writer uses words that communicate clearly, but the writing lacks variety, punch or flair.
Poor

Writer uses a limited vocabulary that does not communicate strongly or capture the reader's interest.
Conventions

Punctuation, grammar

Excellent

Writer makes no or few errors that distract the reader from the content.
Good

Writer makes a few errors that distract the reader from the content.
Fair

Writer makes several errors that distract the reader from the content.
Poor

Writer makes many errors, making the essay difficult to read.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60