Skip to main content
iRubric: Oceanography Final Project rubric

iRubric: Oceanography Final Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Oceanography Final Project 
Oceanography Final Project
Design a multimedia project of your choice that: •uses a multimedia program •includes cooperative groups •includes a presentation of information. When selecting multimedia keep in mind the due date for the project and how well your presentation can inform and address all areas of the rubric.
Rubric Code: CX7XA82
By ssharif
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Individual or Group Project
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Visual Aid
10 %

Poor

Students used a form of visual aid but did not take advantage of creative and effective tools available. Project seems quickly put together and disorganized.
Fair

Students used a form of visual aid to display information. Students did not present data in the best format to show results.
Good

Students made full use of a form of visual aid and its capabilities as needed to display information. Use of visual aid was not utilized in the best possible way to present the data.
Excellent

Students made full use of a form of visual aid and its capabilities as needed to display information. Use of visual aid was not a distraction but an aide in the presentation of data.
Group Work
10 %

This category will not be used for projects submitted by individual students. Instead, your visual aid score will count as 20%.
Poor

Students were assigned group work but worked as individuals. Entire group did not work together to complete project. Work was assigned to one or two individuals to complete.
Fair

Students worked in a group. Specific student responsibilities were at times misunderstood or unclear. Perhaps students had a hard time establishing roles. Communication and cooperation failed at times.
Good

Students worked in a group setting where tasks were divided up equally, jobs were understood and cooperation and communication was maintained most of the time.
Excellent

Students worked in a group setting where tasks were divided up equally, jobs were understood and cooperation and communication was maintained at all times.
Data
50 %

Required elements: all elements on the documented list.
Poor

Research was sparse. Data found was borrowed or irrelevant to topic.
Fair

Students performed research and presented data. Not all data was displayed in the most proper format. Not all information included was correct. Sources perhaps were not all credible or well documented.
Good

Research and data was thorough and cohesive. Data was processed and displayed appropriately. Perhaps some information is lacking or incorrect. Sources included are credible and documented.
Excellent

Research and data was thorough and cohesive. Data was processed and displayed appropriately and correctly. Sources included are credible and documented.
Individual grade
5 %

For group members only. Each group member may receive a different grade in this category. Write your individual role here:
Poor

Individual member did not participate much in creating and presenting the project. Group member was absent during creation or presentation.
Fair

Group member participated in creating and presenting the project. Other group members appeared to do a much larger portion of the work.
Good

Group member participated in creating and presenting the project. Other group members appeared to do a larger portion of the work.
Excellent

Group member played a key role in creating and presenting the project.
Creativity, Citations, Originality
25 %

Evidence of excessive cutting-and-pasting vs. use of language appropriate for student(s); images copied without regard to their appropriateness and/or no citation of sources.
Poor

Project was original but lacked overall creativity. All cut-and-paste, with no citations to sources of material.
Fair

Project was original and showed a little creativity. Most of the textual language was appropriate for the audience (students), and there were some citations to sources.
Good

Project was original and showed creativity. The language was appropriate and most of the sources were properly cited.
Excellent

Project was original (virtually no evidence of cut-and-paste text), and showed a lot of creativity. All sources were properly cited.



Keywords:
  • ecology, ecosystems, environment, species, threat


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n178