Skip to main content

iRubric: STEM Research III Formal Report rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
STEM Research III Formal Report STEM Research III Formal Presentation Rubric Code: CX5838W By emmafettes Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Formal Report
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Title Page and Table of Contents	Poor Title page with no names or Table of Contents.	Fair Title with Group Name and members names.	Good Title with Group and members. Incomplete Table of Contents.	Excellent Title with Group Name and members. Table of Content referencing pages for report sections.
Introduction/Research	Poor No information about the nature and science of your project. Does not clearly defines the purpose and hypothesis of your project.	Fair Little information discussing the nature and science of your project. Defines the purpose or the hypothesis of your project.	Good Some information discussing the nature and science of your project. Somewhat defines the purpose and hypothesis of your project.	Excellent Detailed introduction discussing the nature and science of your project. Clearly defines the purpose and hypothesis of your project.
Materials & Procedures	Poor Incomplete list of materials. Unorganized final procedures for the different aspect of your project. Could not follow procedures for replication.	Fair Incomplete list of materials. Unorganized final procedures for the different aspects of your project.	Good Incomplete of materials. Final procedures of the different aspects of your project. Some trouble following procedures for replication	Excellent Detailed list of materials. Detailed final procedures of the different aspects of your project. Easy to follow to replicate.
Design & Calculations	Poor Vague drawing of any engineered aspects of your project. No calculations used to help determine performance if necessary.	Fair Vague digital drawings of any engineered aspects of your project. Few calculations used to help determine performance if necessary.	Good Detailed digital drawings, with no metric dimensions, for any engineered aspects of your project. Some calculations used to help determine performance if necessary.	Excellent Detailed digital drawings, with metric dimensions for any engineered aspects of your project. Detailed calculations used to help determine performance if necessary.
Results	Poor Incomplete data represented to support research. No tables or diagrams used organize data. Metric system was not used. Unorganized and not easy to understand.	Fair Incomplete data represented to support research. Tables provided but not labeled appropriately. Diagrams provided but not labeled appropriately. Metric system used. Somewhat organized.	Good Data represented to support research. Tables labeled appropriately. Diagrams labeled appropriately. Metric system used. Somewhat organized and easy to understand.	Excellent All data represented to support research. Tables labeled appropriately. Diagrams labeled appropriately. Metric system used. Very organized and easy to understand.
Analysis & Conclusion	Poor Did not explain how your project met the original purpose and supported your hypothesis. Did not use data to support your claims.	Fair Vague explanation of how your project met the original purpose and supported your hypothesis. Vaguely used data to completely support your claims.	Good Good explanation of how your project met the original purpose and supported your hypothesis. Using data to completely support your claims.	Excellent Detailed explanation of how your project met the original purpose and supported your hypothesis. Using data to completely support your claims.
Reflection	Poor What could be done differently, etc. Vague ideas of how the project can be continued in future classes.	Fair What could be done differently, etc. Vague ideas of how the project can be continued in future classes.	Good What could be done differently, etc. Some ideas good of how the project can be continued in future classes.	Excellent What could be done differently, etc. Any ideas of how to make this project better. Gave excellent ideas of how the project can be continued in future classes.
Work Cited	Poor Incomplete list of references / resources.	Fair Incomplete list of references of resources used to complete your project, with no proper citation format.	Good List of references of resources used to complete your project, using some citation format.	Excellent Detailed list of references of resources used to complete your project, using proper citation format.
Acknowledgements	Poor	Fair Incomplete list of acknowledgements and how each was helpful in this project.	Good List of acknowledgements but did not explain how each was helpful in this project.	Excellent Detailed list of acknowledgements and how each was helpful in this project.

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Chemistry rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202