Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: People in Theater History rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
People in Theater History
People in Theater History
Rubric Code:
CA89WA
By
lisabrewer
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
People in Theater History
Poor
5 pts
Fair
10 pts
Good
15 pts
Exemplary
20 pts
Writing Process/Use of Time
Poor
Presentation/Paper gives evidence of poor use of class time and reflects mostly wasting class time.
Fair
Presentation/Paper gives evidence of poor use of class time.
Good
Presentationd/ Paper gives evidence of good use of class time.
Exemplary
Presentation/Paper gives evidence of very Good use of class time.
Research
Poor
Information gave some good information of the topic but left out more than two major facts.
Fair
Information gave some information of the topic but left one to two major facts.
Good
Information presented gave a solid understanding of the topic.
Exemplary
Information gave a thorough understanding of the topic, with additional. interesting side notes or trivia related to the topic.
Timeline/Accuracy
Poor
Didn’t know the approximate time of the period or a timeline for the period or topic .
Fair
Presented a vague idea or basic timeline of the period or topic. Definitely more information is needed.
Good
Presented a good idea timeline of the period or topic. More information needed.
Exemplary
Presented the approximate time and/or a timeline for the period or topic .
Format
Poor
Slideshow was hard to read/understand.
Paper was not done in the accurate font or format at all.
Fair
Slideshow was sometimes hard to read/understand.
Paper was not done in the accurate font or format entirely, missing 2 format concepts.
Good
Slideshow was legible and was able to be read/understood.
Paper was not done in the accurate font or format entirely, missing 1 format concept.
Exemplary
Slideshow was well done and legible.
Paper was done in Times New Roman, size 12, double spaced and was easy to read.
Works Cited
Poor
Less than 3 sources used, no use of MLA formatting at all.
Fair
Less than 4 sources used, basic MLA format with errors.
Good
Less than 5 sources used, basic MLA format used.
Exemplary
5 or more sources used, MLA format used throughout.
Visual Aid - EXTRA
Poor
A visual aid was done, but done poorly
Fair
A visual aid was done, but was mediocre
Good
A visual aid was done, and done fairly well.
Exemplary
An outstanding visual aid was created to assist the project.
Subjects:
Arts and Design
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.