Skip to main content

iRubric: Non-Profit Project FINAL PRESENTATION rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Non-Profit Project FINAL PRESENTATION Non-Profit Project FINAL PRESENTATION This is a rubric for the oral presentation about a non-profit that the students created. Rubric Code: CA4223 By Kristenols Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

CONTENT/INFORMATION How well did you answer each of the following questions?
	UNSATISFACTORY 2 pts	NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 pts	ORDINARY 6 pts	SATISFACTORY 8 pts	OUTSTANDING 10 pts	Comments? (N/A)
What is the problem? Clearly states the problem the non-profit is trying to help.	UNSATISFACTORY This question was not answered at all	NEEDS IMPROVEMENT This question was answered, very briefly, no real detail, no supporting evidence.	ORDINARY Question was answered adequately. Lacking in some detail, and leaving some to be desired. May or may not present supporting evidence.	SATISFACTORY Question was answered in detail; had well-documented facts.	OUTSTANDING This question was answered in exquisite detail, supported by verifiable facts. Superb explanation understandable at every level.	Comments?
Why is this so important? Explains why the problem is so important and the need for the non-profit	UNSATISFACTORY This question was not answered at all	NEEDS IMPROVEMENT This question was answered, very briefly, no real detail, no supporting evidence.	ORDINARY Question was answered adequately. Lacking in some detail, and leaving some to be desired. May or may not present supporting evidence.	SATISFACTORY Question was answered in detail; had well-documented facts.	OUTSTANDING This question was answered in exquisite detail, supported by verifiable facts. Superb explanation understandable at every level.	Comments?
What is the goal of your non-profit What is the goal of your non-profit and how do you plan on meeting your goal?	UNSATISFACTORY This question was not answered at all	NEEDS IMPROVEMENT This question was answered, very briefly, no real detail, no supporting evidence.	ORDINARY Question was answered adequately. Lacking in some detail, and leaving some to be desired. May or may not present supporting evidence.	SATISFACTORY Question was answered in detail; had well-documented facts.	OUTSTANDING This question was answered in exquisite detail, supported by verifiable facts. Superb explanation understandable at every level.	Comments?
What is your mission statement? Clearly explains the mission of your non-profit.	UNSATISFACTORY This question was not answered at all	NEEDS IMPROVEMENT This question was answered, very briefly, no real detail, no supporting evidence.	ORDINARY Question was answered adequately. Lacking in some detail, and leaving some to be desired. May or may not present supporting evidence.	SATISFACTORY Question was answered in detail; had well-documented facts.	OUTSTANDING This question was answered in exquisite detail, supported by verifiable facts. Superb explanation understandable at every level.	Comments?
What will you do to fix it? Your solution. What is your group going to do (as specifically as possible) to fix this problem?	UNSATISFACTORY This question was not answered at all.	NEEDS IMPROVEMENT This question was answered, very briefly, no real detail. Lack of innovative idea.	ORDINARY Question was answered adequately. Lacking in some detail, and leaving some to be desired.<BR> <BR> Some evidence of original thinking.	SATISFACTORY Original, believable idea explained in enough detail to understand.	OUTSTANDING Fantastic idea, completely believable, innovative and original, explained in great detail in a way understandable at every level.	Comments?
OTHER CRITERIA Other critera to be graded upon:
	UNSATISFACTORY 2 pts	NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 4 pts	ORDINARY 6 pts	SATISFACTORY 8 pts	OUTSTANDING 10 pts	Comments? (N/A)
Creativity/Originality How creative/original was the presentation entertaining?	UNSATISFACTORY None of the presentation was original work. Presentation not engaging.	NEEDS IMPROVEMENT Presentation mostly non-original work. Presentaion not engaging.	ORDINARY Some original work. Project shows lack of creativity and/or effort to be original. Presentation not engaging or entertaining.	SATISFACTORY Mostly original work. Presentation shows creativity and is engaging and informative.	OUTSTANDING 100% original project. Creative and clever, unique idea that was entertaining, engaging and informative.	Comments?
Depth of Detail/Accuracy As a whole, how detailed was the presentation? Was the information presented accurate and in-depth?	UNSATISFACTORY No real detail of information. <BR> Information is both inaccurate and not supported.	NEEDS IMPROVEMENT Presentation lacked detailed information. Information inaccurate and/or not supported.	ORDINARY Presentation was somewhat detailed. Some questions answered in detail, others lacking. Information accurate and supported.	SATISFACTORY Presentation was detailed, all questions were answered in great detail and supported by verifiable, accurate facts.	OUTSTANDING Entire presentation was in exquisite detail, supported by accurate, verifiable facts. Superb explanation understandable at every level. Students went above and beyond required questions.	Comments?
Individual Components Written Proposal, Digital Requirements, Flyer&Interactive	UNSATISFACTORY 1 out of the three components (written, digital, flyer&interactive) met all of the requirements.	NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 1 out of the three met all of the requirements. The other two components met some of the requirements.	ORDINARY 2 out of the three components met all of the requirement.	SATISFACTORY All three components met all of the requirements.	OUTSTANDING All three components met all of the requirements. Students went above and beyond to add more information.	Comments?
Citations Were pictures/data/facts cited? Were they cited properly?	UNSATISFACTORY no citations present.	NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 1-2 citations cited properly < More citations, but cited improperly.	ORDINARY 3-4 citations, most cited properly.	SATISFACTORY 5 citations, properly cited	OUTSTANDING >5 citations, all cited properly.	Comments?

Subjects:

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Science rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178