- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: ENG 392: Teaching Philosophy & Digital Video rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
ENG 392: Teaching Philosophy & Digital Video Reflection Paper: Pop Culture This product should show an understanding and analysis of your experiences with teaching writing. It should also demonstrate your thoughts on integrating these ideas in your classroom. Rubric Code: C8WW85 By schmidtp Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Podcast & Paper
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Poor 2 pts
Content	Excellent Major points are clearly stated and supported by well-thought out arguments. Content & purpose are clear.	Good There is an appropriate framework to the paper that is consistently supported. Content is minimally inconsistent with regard to purpose.	Poor Very little framework to the paper; support is lacking or is inaccurate. Unclear if writer understands their purpose or the assignment.
Voice	Excellent Professional 'voice' is consistent throughout the paper.	Good Voice wavers between professional and informal.	Poor Voice is primarily informal.
Development	Excellent Paper shows a high level of creativity, thought, and attention to detail.	Good Paper shows a moderate level of creativity, thought, and attention to detail.	Poor Paper presents presents little to no creativity, thought, or attention to detail.
Conventions	Excellent All grammatical and format conventions are correct.	Good There are minor errors in either grammatical or format conventions.	Poor This paper requires a rewrite.
Voice, Delivery, Audio	Excellent Essay shows speaker's unique style and voice. Speaker's voice consistently shows interest and emotion to complement the written component.	Good Essay reflects inconsistent representation of speaker's style. Speaker's voice inconsistently shows interest and emotion to complement the written component.	Poor Essay shows a generic style. Speaker's voice is monotone and lacks any emotional connection to the material.
Format, Visual Appeal	Excellent High quality visual representation of the essay.	Good There are minor lapses in the product's quality.	Poor The podcast/video is of poor technical quality.