iRubric: Chapter One rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Chapter One Interpersonal reflection Rubric for chapter one of your capstone Rubric Code: C5XX33 By kellycoyle Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Business Type: Writing Grade Levels: Graduate

Interpersonal reflection
	Excellent 4 pts	Adequate 3 pts	Emerging 2 pts	Needs Attention 1 pts
Content	Excellent Your document contains all required information, presently clearly.	Adequate Everything is there, but sometimes it is hard to see what you mean. A section or two may need further development.	Emerging Required material is missing or incomplete from the chapter, or else is so hard to understand that a reader can't tell that it is there.	Needs Attention Parts are missing, skipped, impossible to find, or too difficult to understand.
Motivation	Excellent Your document explains why you chose the topic, and vividly illustrates its importance.	Adequate Your document explains why you think the topic is important.	Emerging You provide at least some insight into your selection of topic.	Needs Attention Missing, or else is incoherent or unclear.
Format	Excellent Document follows Saint Mary's guidelines for the use of APA style. Citations are correct and complete.	Adequate Document follows Saint Mary's guidelines for the use of APA style at least most of the time. Citations are correct and complete.	Emerging APA style has many errors, is inconsistent, citations are missing.	Needs Attention What is this APA you keep talking about? Citations are missing, quotations are unattributed, the Works Cited page is sketchy or incomplete.
Mechanics	Excellent No appreciable errors in grammar, spelling, or sentence and paragraph construction. The organization is compelling, and leads the reader clearly along.	Adequate Any errors do not interfere with communication or damage author's credibility. May have small problems, e.g., with word choice, but the document remains easy to understand. The organization is clear.	Emerging Document has errors that damage the author's credibility: noticeable violations of grammar, punctuation, and spelling conventions. Poor or even insulting word choices. The organization hinders comprehension, or is confusing.	Needs Attention Document is hard to understand due to errors in construction and mechanics. The paper is not organized in any decipherable way.