Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Environmental Science Extended Current Event Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Environmental Science Extended Current Event Rubric
Current Events Rubric
Students are to complete the extended current event using the following rubric as part of their Current Event Assessment project
Rubric Code:
C5A32X
By
neitzer
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Current Events Rubric
Outstanding Work
10 pts
Well Done
8 pts
Basic
4 pts
Does not meet epectations
2 pts
No credit
0 pts
Article/Source
Outstanding Work
The articles are local, state, national or world current event related to assigned topic. The information is easy to understand, and at least 5 sources are used. The articles (cut out or photocopied) were submitted with report.
Well Done
The articles submitted are either not current or not attached, but are from valid sources, and are pertinent to topic assigned in class. The information is easy to understand, and at least 5 sources are used.
Basic
The articles are not attached and are from an invalid source. At least 5 articles are used.Do contain a brief mention of the assigned topic.
Does not meet epectations
The 5 or more articles have no relevance to assigned topic or at least 5 articles are not used.
No credit
No articles are used.
Citation
Outstanding Work
Articles/Sources are documented using the MLA format and contain ALL elements.
Well Done
Articles/Sources are documented but is missing some required MLA elements.
Basic
Articles/Sources are documented but are missing many MLA elements.
Does not meet epectations
Article/Source is not documented using MLA format.
No credit
Article/source is not included.
Part One
Outstanding Work
Part 1 is written in paragraph form. The topic's history, current status and values involved on each side clearly explained.
Well Done
Part 1 is not written in paragraph OR
A summary of the required components are included, but lacking clarity.
Basic
Part 1 is written in a few sentences
AND
A summary of the required components are included, but lacking clarity.
Does not meet epectations
Part 1 is not written in paragraphs but is simply listed.
No credit
Part 1 is not present.
Response/Application
Outstanding Work
Your opinion is more than one paragraph (6-8 sentences a piece), explains your reactions and opinions to the information in your research. The reason for your opinion is listed. Facts are included from the articles to support your opinion/reaction.
Well Done
Your opinion is at least one paragraph (6-8 sentences), somewhat explains your reactions and opinions to the information in your research. The reason for your opinion is vague at best. It includes some evidence to support your opinion/reaction.
Basic
Your opinion is a few sentences and slightly explains your reactions and opinions to the information. The reason is not listed. Your paper does not include evidence to support your opinion/reaction.
Does not meet epectations
Opinion is listed, but not explained. Your paper does not include evidence to support your opinion/reaction.
No credit
No opinion is included.
Conventions
Outstanding Work
Words are well chosen and concise. There were NO errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization or grammar.
Well Done
There were very few errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization or grammar. Paragraphs were properly formatted. Proof reading evident.
Basic
Some errors occurred in capitalization, punctuation, word usage, run-on sentences, and/or fragments. Paragraph formatting was inconsistent. Proof reading questionable.
Does not meet epectations
Numerous errors in spelling, capitalization, punctuation, word usage, run-on sentences, and/or sentence fragments. Paragraphs not indented or formatting inconsistent. No evidence of proof reading.
No credit
Conventions were not a consideration in your attempt.
Expectations
Outstanding Work
At least 9 of the specified topic are mentioned and clearly explained. The mission has been accomplished.
Well Done
At least 7 of the specified topics have been mentioned and clearly explained. The mission has been strongly worked toward, but not met.
Basic
At least 5 of the specified topics have been mentioned and clearly explained. The mission has been worked toward, but not met.
Does not meet epectations
At least 3 of the specified topics have been mentioned and clearly explained. The mission has been abandoned without work toward completion.
No credit
Less than 3 of the specified topics have been mentioned and/or explained. The mission appears to have been forgotten.
Subjects:
Geography
Science
Social Sciences
Types:
Assignment
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Geography rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.